1991
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sense of place: an empirical measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
254
0
61

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 436 publications
(347 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
254
0
61
Order By: Relevance
“…The second domain embraces cause and effect relationships between concepts, prediction, hypothesis testing, and where appropriate, generalization (e.g., see Shamai 1991, Lalli 1992, Jorgensen and Stedman 2001. This approach separates core constructs into different spheres such as cognition and emotion, and emphasizes the individual as the unit of analysis.…”
Section: An Approach To Sense Of Place Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second domain embraces cause and effect relationships between concepts, prediction, hypothesis testing, and where appropriate, generalization (e.g., see Shamai 1991, Lalli 1992, Jorgensen and Stedman 2001. This approach separates core constructs into different spheres such as cognition and emotion, and emphasizes the individual as the unit of analysis.…”
Section: An Approach To Sense Of Place Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it is often viewed as the most encompassing core construct within associated research (e.g., Shamai 1991, Kaltenborn 1998. Crucially, our approach to sense of place analysis emphasizes both attachment and meanings, although these concepts are sometimes conflated and greater analytical emphasis is given to place attachment than to place meanings (Stedman 2008).…”
Section: An Introduction To Key Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shamai (1991) developed the sense of place measurement indicating the strength of place attachment. The scale ranges from 'no sense of place' (value of 0) to 'deepest commitment and sacrifice to the place' (value of 6).…”
Section: Attachment and Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps, it is better to display place attachment using a spectrum of place attachment containing no attachment at one end and place identity at the other end and place attachment somewhere between the two ends. Some studies aimed to evaluate the idea of spectrum and examine the power of place attachment (or sense of place) from lack of information about the place (without attachment) to obligation to it or even sacrificing for the place (Kaltenborn, 1998;Shamai, 1991). This classification is more useful when it is combined with scales of components of place dependence and place identity so that the possible conceptualization of these components and their correlations be more examined (Hay, 1998a, b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%