2016
DOI: 10.3390/fi8040050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Senior Living Lab: An Ecological Approach to Foster Social Innovation in an Ageing Society

Abstract: Abstract:The Senior Living Lab (SLL) is a transdisciplinary research platform created by four Universities that aims at promoting ageing well at home through the co-creation of innovative products, services and practices with older adults. While most living labs for ageing well are focused on Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), this social laboratory adopts a transdisciplinary approach, bringing together designers, economists, engineers and healthcare professionals to develop multiple forms of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
42
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, bureaucracy (formality, hierarchy, uniformity) may hinder the uptake of ICTs to co-produce. Turning to citizens, use of ICTs to co-produce may be hampered by a range of structural factors, including their technical skills and motivations, or citizens' demographic factors, such as their gender and age (Angelini et al, 2016;Max-Neef, 2005;Van Deursen and Van Dijk, 2011). Furthermore, citizens may avoid ICTs due to a range of cultural factors, including their reluctance to integrate these practices as a habit into their daily lives, fears that ICTs may invade their privacy, or because they do not trust in government (Fledderus, 2015;Porumbescu, 2016).…”
Section: Framework For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, bureaucracy (formality, hierarchy, uniformity) may hinder the uptake of ICTs to co-produce. Turning to citizens, use of ICTs to co-produce may be hampered by a range of structural factors, including their technical skills and motivations, or citizens' demographic factors, such as their gender and age (Angelini et al, 2016;Max-Neef, 2005;Van Deursen and Van Dijk, 2011). Furthermore, citizens may avoid ICTs due to a range of cultural factors, including their reluctance to integrate these practices as a habit into their daily lives, fears that ICTs may invade their privacy, or because they do not trust in government (Fledderus, 2015;Porumbescu, 2016).…”
Section: Framework For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 In parallel, more and more healthcare professionals and individual citizens want to participate in these innovations and voice their opinions on the definition of pertinent, innovative, and implementable solutions. 8 Indeed, the field of health care is actively looking for open-innovation approaches to meeting the day to day complexities of clinical practice. One means of doing this is by driving collaborative multi-stakeholder inquiries that can better identify and respond to the complex health needs of community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment due to varied etiologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focus group was a method to debate about open topics, such as nutrition, mobility, and interpersonal communication; it also helped to investigate the users' perception of existing technological options. The World Café was a gathering that involved the users in discussing prepared topics, such as the most valuable elements that relevant to the older adults' health aging and the innovative ways to obtain them (Angelini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Categorization Of Users and Their Roles In Udimentioning
confidence: 99%