2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiparametric model for prediction of individual claim loss reserving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first approach uses aggregate claim data, which makes it hard to relate person‐specific risk factors to individual claim sizes (Zhao and Zhou, ). The second approach is based on a statistical model that captures the relation between individual claim sizes on the one hand and person‐specific characteristics or other relevant risk factors on the other hand (e.g., Czado and Rudolph, ; Larsen, ; Zhao, Zhou, and Wang ; Antonio and Plat, 2010; Zhao and Zhou, ; Levantesi and Menzietti, ). The statistical model is used to estimate the claim size distribution of a single policyholder with certain risk factors, which provides input for the estimate of an individual liability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach uses aggregate claim data, which makes it hard to relate person‐specific risk factors to individual claim sizes (Zhao and Zhou, ). The second approach is based on a statistical model that captures the relation between individual claim sizes on the one hand and person‐specific characteristics or other relevant risk factors on the other hand (e.g., Czado and Rudolph, ; Larsen, ; Zhao, Zhou, and Wang ; Antonio and Plat, 2010; Zhao and Zhou, ; Levantesi and Menzietti, ). The statistical model is used to estimate the claim size distribution of a single policyholder with certain risk factors, which provides input for the estimate of an individual liability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Larsen (2007) revisited the work of Norberg, Haastrup and Arjas with a small case-study. Zhao et al (2009) and Zhao and Zhou (2010) present a model for individual claims development using (semi-parametric) techniques from survival analysis and copula methods. However, a case study is lacking in their work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Generally, one can base the assumption of claims intensity on her/his a priori knowledge on the claims occurrence process; the more knowledge, the less unknown components of the model. While the model above assumes homogeneous claims intensity, which has been investigated by, e.g., Norberg (1986), Pigeon et al (2013Pigeon et al ( , 2014, another possible model is heterogeneous claims intensity, such as discussed by, e.g., Norberg (1993Norberg ( , 1999, Zhao et al (2009), and Zhao and Zhou (2010). Though what we are discussing is the mathematically simplest homogeneous intensity, an analysis for heterogeneous intensity can be obtained in a similar way due to the adopted discrete-time setting.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Larsen (2007) estimated stochastic reserving by means of the decomposition of a PDMPP into independent sections so as to accordingly split likelihood into products that can be maximized separately in isolation. Zhao et al (2009) and Zhao and Zhou (2010) extended the results by allowing dependence between delays and heterogeneous response variable and can contain various covariate effects. More recently, following the framework of Norberg (1993Norberg ( , 1999, Antonio and Plat (2014) analyzed a set of real insurance data from a European company.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%