2015
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2014.976473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Loss Reserving in Discrete Time: Individual vs. Aggregate Data Models

Abstract: In this paper, a stochastic individual data model is considered. It accommodates occurrence times, reporting, and settlement delays and severity of every individual claims. This formulation gives rise to a model for the corresponding aggregate data under which classical chain ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson algorithms apply. A claims reserving algorithm is developed under this individual data model and comparisons of its performance with chain ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson algorithms are madeto reveal the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this perspective, the sufficient statistics for the aggregated model tell us that no information is lost while aggregating. For more on aggregation of "micro" level information, see, for example, Huang et al (2015Huang et al ( , 2016, Charpentier and Pigeon (2016), . (e) Note that the above model can be expressed in terms of the hierarchical model framework presented in Crevecoeur and Antonio (2019), using number of open claims as one of the layers.…”
Section: Data and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this perspective, the sufficient statistics for the aggregated model tell us that no information is lost while aggregating. For more on aggregation of "micro" level information, see, for example, Huang et al (2015Huang et al ( , 2016, Charpentier and Pigeon (2016), . (e) Note that the above model can be expressed in terms of the hierarchical model framework presented in Crevecoeur and Antonio (2019), using number of open claims as one of the layers.…”
Section: Data and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, since the R ij s will be proportional to the corresponding N ij s (or expectations thereof), R ij /w i can be thought of as the approximate reserve from a single contract. Thus, consistency of R ij /w i has a natural interpretation and is also treated in, for example, Huang et al (2015Huang et al ( , 2016.…”
Section: Comments On Consistency Of Normalised Reservesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual reserving models describe how each claim evolves over time, from the occurrence of the accident until settlement of the claim. In addition to the pioneering works by Arjas (1989) and Norberg (1993Norberg ( , 1999, let us also mention the contributions by Larsen (2007), Zhao et al (2009), Drieskens et al (2012), Rosenlund (2012), Antonio and Plat (2014), Pigeon et al (2013Pigeon et al ( , 2014, and Huang et al (2015Huang et al ( , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears more convenient and more applicable to practice to statistically model the individual loss reserving with a discrete time framework, similar to Hesselager (1995), Pigeon et al (2013Pigeon et al ( , 2014, and Godecharle and Antonio (2015). Along this line, Huang et al (2015aHuang et al ( , b, 2016) demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean squared error of loss reserves using individual/micro data from the popular aggregate data models that typically employ such methods as the chain-ladder and Bornhuetter-Ferguson. They did this by, respectively, deriving their asymptotic variances and numerically comparing them, thus pointing out a promising direction for more informative loss reserving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%