2006
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.74.012722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semiclassical treatment of excitation and electron loss inAq++H(1s)collisions using spherical Bessel functions

Abstract: We perform monocentric close-coupling calculations to obtain partial and total cross sections for excitation and electron loss in bare A q+ +H͑1s͒ collisions, with 1 ഛ q ഛ 6, for intermediate ͑E =40 keV/amu͒ to high ͑E = 7000 keV/ amu͒ impact energies. We use underlying basis sets of even-tempered Slater-type orbitals and confined spherical Bessel functions and compare the accuracy of the cross sections derived from these two implementations. Scaling rules are then established for the partial excitation cross … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
6
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results overestimate the results of Schultz et al [14] in the energy region 20 kev to 50 keV and then underestimates above the said energy region. In comparison to the theoretical results of Errea et al [20] and Shakeshaft [39], our results bear the same features. In the high energy region, BCCIS results are closer to those of Errea et al [20] and Schultz et al [14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results overestimate the results of Schultz et al [14] in the energy region 20 kev to 50 keV and then underestimates above the said energy region. In comparison to the theoretical results of Errea et al [20] and Shakeshaft [39], our results bear the same features. In the high energy region, BCCIS results are closer to those of Errea et al [20] and Schultz et al [14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In comparison to the theoretical results of Errea et al [20] and Shakeshaft [39], our results bear the same features. In the high energy region, BCCIS results are closer to those of Errea et al [20] and Schultz et al [14]. For 2p excitations, our BCCIS results in Figure 1(b) are compared with the theoretical results of Schultz et al [14], Errea et al [20], Shakeshaft [39] and Tong et al [26].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this respect, it has to be noted that the lower bound of validity of perturbative calculations increases with the projectile charge [58], so particular care has to be taken before including perturbative cross sections in the Monte Carlo track structure codes that aim at describing the dynamics induced by charged particles passing through biological environments [15,16]. We safely venture that our nonperturbative CTMC results are more accurate than those of Refs.…”
Section: C 6+ + H 2 O Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 63%