2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0266466617000135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Parametric Seasonal Unit Root Tests

Abstract: It is well known that (seasonal) unit root tests can be seriously affected by the presence of weak dependence in the driving shocks when this is not accounted for. In the non-seasonal case both parametric (based around augmentation of the test regression with lagged dependent variables) and semi-parametric (based around an estimator of the long run variance of the shocks) unit root tests have been proposed. Of these, the M class of unit root tests introduced by Stock (1999), Perron and Ng (1996) and Ng and Per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Lemma 1 we now provide a multivariate invariance principle for X n in . Where u Sn + s is serially uncorrelated this contains, as a particular case, the result given in Lemma A.1 of del Barrio Castro et al () (see Remark ), and will form the basic building block for the asymptotic results that will be provided in this article.…”
Section: Seasonally Near‐integrated Processesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Lemma 1 we now provide a multivariate invariance principle for X n in . Where u Sn + s is serially uncorrelated this contains, as a particular case, the result given in Lemma A.1 of del Barrio Castro et al () (see Remark ), and will form the basic building block for the asymptotic results that will be provided in this article.…”
Section: Seasonally Near‐integrated Processesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In particular, we could permit u Sn + s to follow a stationary and invertible ARMA process thereby allowing non‐zero stable roots to occur and these could be identified with any observable spectral frequency. Doing so would introduce additional nuisance parameters, deriving from the stationary autocorrelation, into the large sample results given in Lemma 1 (see del Barrio Castro et al , , for details on how our key results given below in and Lemma 1 would need to be modified when u Sn + s is serially correlated) but would not alter the conclusions drawn from them regarding the integrational properties of the aggregated data. Moreover, the implied ARMA dynamics in the time aggregated data arising from stationary and invertible ARMA shocks in the original data is already well documented in the literature; see, for example, Chapter 20 of Wei () for an excellent summary.…”
Section: Seasonally Near‐integrated Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations