2019
DOI: 10.1111/jtsa.12453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal Aggregation of Seasonally Near‐Integrated Processes

Abstract: We investigate the implications that temporally aggregating, either by average sampling or systematic (skip) sampling, a seasonal process has on the integration properties of the resulting series at both the zero and seasonal frequencies. Our results extend the existing literature in three ways. First, they demonstrate the implications of temporal aggregation for a general seasonally integrated process with S seasons. Second, rather than only considering the aggregation of seasonal processes with exact unit ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Gregoir (1999a, 1999a,2006) and del Barrio Castro et al . (2018,2019), (5) is equivalent to xtprefix−=eprefix−iωtxt()0prefix− where xt0=x0+=1teiωνI01. Note that, here it is clearly shown that x0prefix− is the starting value of xt()0prefix− and that eprefix−iωtx0prefix− is the starting value of xtprefix−. The demodulator operator of (5) therefore shifts the zero frequency peak of the complex‐valued process xt()0prefix−to frequency ω, leading to a complex‐valued xtprefix−Iωfalse(1false).…”
Section: Integration At a Frequencymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted by Gregoir (1999a, 1999a,2006) and del Barrio Castro et al . (2018,2019), (5) is equivalent to xtprefix−=eprefix−iωtxt()0prefix− where xt0=x0+=1teiωνI01. Note that, here it is clearly shown that x0prefix− is the starting value of xt()0prefix− and that eprefix−iωtx0prefix− is the starting value of xtprefix−. The demodulator operator of (5) therefore shifts the zero frequency peak of the complex‐valued process xt()0prefix−to frequency ω, leading to a complex‐valued xtprefix−Iωfalse(1false).…”
Section: Integration At a Frequencymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…where e −i𝜔t is the demodulator operator and x − 0 is assumed to be O p (1) (with x − 0 been part of the starting value of x − t that is, e −i𝜔t x − 0 ). As noted by Gregoir (1999a, 2006) and del Barrio Castro et al (2018, 2019, ( 5) is equivalent to…”
Section: Integration At a Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that in this paper, we consider Situations 3 and 4 because when two autoregressive processes in which one is associated to the zero frequency; that is, the AR(1) with a positive coefficient in our paper, and the other is associated to the Nyquist frequency (π); that is, the AR(1) with a negative coefficient in our paper that has power at frequency π and completes a cycle every 2 observations, are independent or even asymptotically orthogonal. Readers may refer to Johansen and Schaumburg (1999), Ghysels and Osborn (2001), and del Barrio Castro et al (2018, 2019 for more information. Readers may also refer to seasonal unit root tests, see, for example, del Barrio Castro et al (2012) and Smith et al (2009), and cointegration for processes integrated at different frequencies, see, for example, del Barrio Castro et al (2020) with properties that are related to the series we are using in our paper.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally note that temporal aggregation from hourly data to daily data implies that the frequency for hourly data aliases to the frequency in the daily data. Therefore the higher evidence of a unit root at found in daily data might be a consequence of the unit root at frequency found for hourly data, compare [ 37 ].…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%