2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-local friction factor of turbulent gas flow through rectangular microchannels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed local fRe correlations as a function of Mach number and Knudsen number corresponding to compressibility and rarefaction effects for quasi-fully developed laminar flow. Their local fRe correlations were in excellent agreement with the experimental data of Hong et al, [9,20]. They also reported pressure variations and mass flow rate for microchannel gas flow using the fRe correlations [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…They proposed local fRe correlations as a function of Mach number and Knudsen number corresponding to compressibility and rarefaction effects for quasi-fully developed laminar flow. Their local fRe correlations were in excellent agreement with the experimental data of Hong et al, [9,20]. They also reported pressure variations and mass flow rate for microchannel gas flow using the fRe correlations [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…To validate the adopted numerical scheme, a MC with hydraulic diameter of 203 μm (MC2) is simulated and numerical friction factors are compared with experiments of Hong et al [19]. The width and height of the MC are 1020 μm and 112.7 μm respectively giving it an aspect ratio of 0.11.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The width and height of the MC are 1020 μm and 112.7 μm respectively giving it an aspect ratio of 0.11. Length of the channel in numerical model is taken as 100 mm while it is 26.9 mm in experiments performed by [19]. Moreover, dimensions of the inlet manifold are slightly different in experimental settings than those adapted in numerical model.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the well-known laminar incompressible parabolic profile derived from the Poiseuille theory [8], flatter profiles result in altered velocity gradients at the wall and thus, by definition, in larger wall shear stresses and growing friction factors. In the literature, the evaluation of the compressible friction factor was addressed in [9] for the laminar case and in [10] for turbulent flow. These works are based on pressure and temperature experimental measurements and do not deal with the local velocity profile change in shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%