The effect of solvent electrostatics and solute torsional modes on the absorption spectrum of betaine-30 in
acetonitrile is examined. Combined quantum/classical molecular dynamics ground state simulations are used
to calculate the electronic absorption spectrum in acetonitrile. The model for betaine-30 includes the electronic
degrees of freedom of the π system of the molecule and their interactions with the electric field of the solvent,
treating the electronic wave function at the level of Pariser−Parr−Pople semiempirical electronic structure
theory. The absorption intensity, width, and maximum of the S0 to S1 band are well reproduced by the model.
In solution, the S0 molecular dipole moment is found to be strongly enhanced due to solvent-induced electronic
reorganization. The width of the absorption band in acetonitrile is found to be a function of solvent orientational
fluctuations and is not correlated with conformational changes caused by torsional motion in the molecule.
This fact, combined with the good agreement between the classical reorganization energies inferred from the
simulated and experimental spectra indicates that, at least in acetonitrile, the classical component of the
reorganization energy is fully determined by solvent orientational polarization. The spectral band maximum
of the lowest energy transition is found to be blue shifted over 7000 cm-1, compared to a calculation in
which the coupling of the betaine-30 electronic structure to the solvent molecules is eliminated, in agreement
with the shift found experimentally for betaine-30 in acetonitrile compared to alkanes. However, in contrast
to the result found in acetonitrile, the transition energy in the absence of solvent interactions is found to be
strongly correlated with the central phenolate−pyridinium dihedral ring angle. This contrasting behavior implies
that in nonpolar solvents, the classical reorganization energy does have a contribution from that torsional
mode. Correspondingly, this difference in behavior with solvent indicates that the assumption of a solvent
independent intramolecular contribution to the reorganization energy is questionable.