2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2019.8779457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Autonomous Tongue Control of an Assistive Robotic Arm for Individuals with Quadriplegia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tool frame based control allowed the user to look around using the camera attached on the end-effector and reach directly towards the desired object to pick it up. Hildebrand et al [28] showed that the tool frame control decreased the TCT and path efficiency compared with the base frame when solving a simple pick and place task. However, as mentioned by Campeau-Lecours et al [30], tool-frame control can be difficult to understand and this is especially true when controlling through a stationary 2D visual feedback as was provided by the camera at the headrest of the wheelchair in this experiment.…”
Section: B Layout Differencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tool frame based control allowed the user to look around using the camera attached on the end-effector and reach directly towards the desired object to pick it up. Hildebrand et al [28] showed that the tool frame control decreased the TCT and path efficiency compared with the base frame when solving a simple pick and place task. However, as mentioned by Campeau-Lecours et al [30], tool-frame control can be difficult to understand and this is especially true when controlling through a stationary 2D visual feedback as was provided by the camera at the headrest of the wheelchair in this experiment.…”
Section: B Layout Differencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to develop a more intuitive low-level control scheme, Campeau-Lecours et al [30] proposed orientation control, which is based on a newly defined adaptive reference frame. Another attempt to provide a better performance when low-level controlling an ARM is endeffector control in which both the robot translation and rotation are defined according to the orientation of the end-effector [28]. As indicated by these studies, other low-level control methods have the potential to make the robotic control even more intuitive for disabled users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semi-autonomous control scheme, where parts of the control are automated using computer vision, is included in the system to further enhance the tongue-based control of the exoskeleton. Several studies have reported increased performance when employing computer vision for semi-autonomous control of assistive robotic manipulators [10], such as completing tasks faster [18,19] or being more precise in the movement of the manipulator [20,21]. Furthermore, there are several examples of computer vision either improving the fine control of an upper limb exoskeleton [13,21] or automating entire parts of a task [11,22,23] for users with paralysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the approaches relying on computer vision employ a clear-cut strategy for arbitrating control between the user and the system, where certain parts of the process are completely automated [10]. For example, reaching for and grasping an object once the user triggers this predefined task, either from a tongue-based interface [20], through voice commands [18], or through eye movements [11,22]. The user would, in these cases, relinquish complete control until the task is completed, i.e., the object is reached and grasped.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such system is the inductive tongue control interface (ITCI) proposed in [17], which has 18 available sensors and is therefore suitable for control of a high DOF system such as an ARM. The ITCI has been used in several studies to control a six DOF ARM [5], [20]- [22], one of which in a remote setting [21], demonstrating the potential of the solution to improving the quality of life and level of independence of individuals with tetraplegia. However, in all of the studies the accuracy of task completion, both in terms of time and success rate, could potentially be improved by the integration of semi-autonomous assistance when controlling the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%