2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Automated Creation of Density Functional Tight Binding Models through Leveraging Chebyshev Polynomial-Based Force Fields

Abstract: Density functional tight binding (DFTB) is an attractive method for accelerated quantum simulations of condensed matter due to its enhanced computational efficiency over standard density functional theory (DFT) approaches. However, DFTB models can be challenging to determine for individual systems of interest, especially for metallic and interfacial systems where different bonding arrangements can lead to significant changes in electronic states. In this regard, we have created a rapid-screening approach for d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DFTB models generally exist within a "sweet-spot" between DFT and completely empirical MD models in terms of accuracy and ease of development. The quantum mechanical part of the calculation tends to be relatively accurate for many conditions and materials, allowing for a reasonable representation of the system's electronic ground state [28]. This is especially true under extreme conditions, where electron repulsions tend to dominate interactions and exchange-correlation interactions do not need to be determined as precisely [47].…”
Section: Chimes Overview: Use As a Dftb Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DFTB models generally exist within a "sweet-spot" between DFT and completely empirical MD models in terms of accuracy and ease of development. The quantum mechanical part of the calculation tends to be relatively accurate for many conditions and materials, allowing for a reasonable representation of the system's electronic ground state [28]. This is especially true under extreme conditions, where electron repulsions tend to dominate interactions and exchange-correlation interactions do not need to be determined as precisely [47].…”
Section: Chimes Overview: Use As a Dftb Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML-IAPs are generally capable of arbitrary complexity and high accuracy, although electronic degrees of freedom such as spin are typically neglected. In addition, ML-IAPs can be developed as corrections to approximate quantum methods such as DFTB [24][25][26][27][28] or to MM-IAPs such as ReaxFF [29]. Typically, correction approaches require fewer parameters and simpler functional forms than ML-IAPs that completely describe the IAP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent methodological developments, like the development of the DFTB3 method 21 and its corresponding parameterization, 22 the use of long-range corrections, 23 improvement of the description of intermolecular 24 and dispersion interactions, 25–28 have significantly increased the accuracy of the method. For parameterization, several automated schemes and schemes which utilize machine learning have been developed, 29–37 increasing the applicability of the DFTB method to different systems and problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12-14 DFTB models have been created for a broad range of materials, though the repulsive energy largely has been tuned to relatively low-level DFT data for condensed phases. [15][16][17][18][19] Recent efforts have been made to enhance the accuracy of DFTB through creation of more sophisticated and systematic approaches for determining the repulsive energy term. and the Curvature Constrained Splines methodology 14 have been used to create strictly pair-wise additive repulsive energies for several organic and inorganic systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliance on Chebyshev polynomials, which are orthogonal, allows the complexity of a ChIMES model to be systematically tuned to an arbitrary degree of accuracy and transferability, while also providing straightforward methods for regularization to minimize overfitting. 16 In this study, we determine an optimal DFTB/ChIMES model for C, H, N, O-containing systems using high level quantum chemical reference data. We use an iterative scheme to systematically expand our training set where at each iteration, a small fraction of the force configurations with largest deviation in our validation set are included in the next training set iteration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%