Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '06 2006
DOI: 10.3115/1610075.1610097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Role Labeling of NomBank

Abstract: This paper describes our attempt at NomBank-based automatic Semantic Role Labeling (SRL). NomBank is a project at New York University to annotate the argument structures for common nouns in the Penn Treebank II corpus. We treat the NomBank SRL task as a classification problem and explore the possibility of adapting features previously shown useful in PropBank-based SRL systems. Various NomBank-specific features are explored. On test section 23, our best system achieves F1 score of 72.73 (69.14) when correct (a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the recognition of the predicate is limited to one EDTU range, which would contribute to a better recognition result. In addition to classical predicate features in previous studies [27][28][29], more features are derived from nominal and verbal SRL(Sematic Role Labeling), such as the location in terms of the NP, the path features, intervening verb and the arguments. Using the Mallet toolkit [26] with features listed in Tables 4 and 5 shows the performance of identifying the entities of MTS on CDTC corpus with 10-fold cross validation.…”
Section: Identifying Entities Of Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the recognition of the predicate is limited to one EDTU range, which would contribute to a better recognition result. In addition to classical predicate features in previous studies [27][28][29], more features are derived from nominal and verbal SRL(Sematic Role Labeling), such as the location in terms of the NP, the path features, intervening verb and the arguments. Using the Mallet toolkit [26] with features listed in Tables 4 and 5 shows the performance of identifying the entities of MTS on CDTC corpus with 10-fold cross validation.…”
Section: Identifying Entities Of Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that along the path from a given word to the root of a syntactic tree, the first/last verb is called its low/high support verb, respectively. This notion is widely adopted in the field (Toutanova et al, 2005;Xue, 2006;Jiang & Ng, 2006). 5 In this work, we extend it to both nouns and prepositions.…”
Section: Feature Elementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given n candidate feature templates, the algorithm by Ding and Chang (2008) requires O(n 2 ) time to execute a training/test routine, whereas the one by Jiang and Ng (2006) requires O(n) time, assuming that the initial set of feature templates is "good" enough and the others can be handled in a strictly incremental way. The time complexity of our algorithm can also be analyzed in terms of the execution time of the training-and-test routine scr(M (.…”
Section: Feature Template Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gildea and Jurafsky (2002) presented an early FrameNet-based SRL system that targeted both verbal and nominal predicates. Jiang and Ng (2006) and Liu and Ng (2007) have tested the hypothesis that methodologies and representations used in PropBank SRL (Pradhan et al, 2005) can be ported to the task of NomBank SRL. These studies report argument F 1 scores of 0.6914 and 0.7283, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the NomBank corpus, only markable instances have been annotated. Previous evaluations (e.g., those by Jiang and Ng (2006) and Liu and Ng (2007)) have been based on markable instances, which constitute 57% of all instances of nominals from the NomBank lexicon. In order to use nominal SRL systems for downstream processing, it is important to develop and evaluate techniques that can handle markable as well as unmarkable nominal instances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%