1988
DOI: 10.2307/1423086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Priming of Anagram Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semantic priming has been widely used across a number of tasks and settings. For example, people are faster to solve anagrams related to semantically primed than unprimed categories (Schuberth et al, 1979;White, 1988). In combination, these lines of research suggest that semantic priming can lead people toward both correct and incorrect solutions.…”
Section: Eliciting False Insights With Semantic Primingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic priming has been widely used across a number of tasks and settings. For example, people are faster to solve anagrams related to semantically primed than unprimed categories (Schuberth et al, 1979;White, 1988). In combination, these lines of research suggest that semantic priming can lead people toward both correct and incorrect solutions.…”
Section: Eliciting False Insights With Semantic Primingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific task used for anagram problem solving is an adaptation of one used by White (1988). In this task, participants are shown strings of letters, some of which are anagrams of real words and some of which are not.…”
Section: Experiments 1a and 1bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This portion of the task may occur entirely serially (as in Sternberg, 1969) after the anagram solution phase, or may overlap partially in a cascaded fashion (as in McClelland, 1979). Alternatively, if anagram solution is driven by tests of “candidate” words generated from some subset of the anagram's letters, as some have proposed (e.g., Dewing & Hetherington, 1974; Richardson & Johnson, 1980; White, 1988), and if people either generate words of known imageability or can test the imageability of generated words while simultaneously testing the anagram for a match to the generated words, this imageability rating of anagrams task should produce no partial information.…”
Section: Experiments 2a and 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anagrams play an important and pervasive role in psychological research. For example, anagrams provide a measure of problem-solving ability (i.e., where the task is to generate a word composed of the same letters as a presented string) that has been used to study a range of psychological issues, including insight (e.g., Smith & Kounios, 1996), aging (e.g., Witte & Freund, 1995), recognition memory (e.g., Weldon, 1991), semantic memory (e.g., White, 1988), and the topography of evoked brain activity (e.g., Skrandies, Reik, & Kunze, 1999). Anagrams have also been used extensively to study processes involved in word recognition, where a great deal of research involves comparing performances between stimuli from different linguistic categories, including frequency, imageability, concreteness, orthographic structure, and lexicality (words vs. nonwords).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%