2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/kwhe9
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliciting false insights with semantic priming

Abstract: The insight experience (or ‘Aha moment’) generally evokes strong feelings of certainty and confidence. An ‘Aha’ experience for a false idea could underlie many false beliefs and delusions. However, for as long as insight experiences have been studied, false insights have remained difficult to elicit experimentally. That difficulty, in turn, highlights the fact that we know little about what causes people to experience a false insight. Across two experiments (total N=300), we developed and tested a new paradigm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also in line with the vast literature on semantic priming and false memory effects in old age which are usually investigated using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm (Akhtar et al, 2020;Evrard et al, 2016;Brod et al, 2013;Sweeney-Reed et al, 2012). Hypothetically, the negative effect of LC on MCA could be a hubris effect, explainable by semantic priming being able to elicit high-confidence false alarms (Grimmer et al, 2022;Laukkonen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Recognition Confidence and Meta-cognitive Accuracysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It is also in line with the vast literature on semantic priming and false memory effects in old age which are usually investigated using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm (Akhtar et al, 2020;Evrard et al, 2016;Brod et al, 2013;Sweeney-Reed et al, 2012). Hypothetically, the negative effect of LC on MCA could be a hubris effect, explainable by semantic priming being able to elicit high-confidence false alarms (Grimmer et al, 2022;Laukkonen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Recognition Confidence and Meta-cognitive Accuracysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The level of support for the movement is hard to measure, but appears remarkably high given the bizarre nature of the claims (Shanahan, 2021). QAnon provides a potential real-life example of our findings in its demonstration that the way the mind constructs 'insights' is fallible (Grimmer et al, 2021), and yet these insights can incite real and sometimes dangerous behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The level of support for the movement is hard to measure, but appears remarkably high given the bizarre nature of the claims (Shanahan, 2021). QAnon provides a potential real-life example of our ndings in its demonstration that the way the mind constructs 'insights' is fallible (Grimmer et al, 2021), and yet these insights can incite real and sometimes dangerous behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moving forward, we encourage a research program on the underlying mechanisms and predictors of false insights-circumstances and states of mind in which this usually adaptive heuristic may break down. A paradigm has recently been developed to experimentally elicit false insights (Grimmer et al, 2021), which could yield valuable data for understanding the development of delusions in clinical populations. Consider, for example, the case of John Nash, the Nobel Laureate and mathematician.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%