1980
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/35.6.884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Activation During Memory Encoding Across the Adult Life Span

Abstract: The hypothesis that automatic processes do not change during aging was investigated using Warren's (1972) modification of the Stroop procedure. The subjects were 14 adults in each of three age groups: young (20 to 39), middle (40 to 59), and old (60 to 79). On each trial, subjects held three category members in memory while they named the ink color in which a base item was printed. For all three age groups, color naming latencies were longer when the base item was from the same category as the memory list item… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Darlene Howard and colleagues showed comparable semantic memory as a function of age (e.g., Howard, Lasaga, & McAndrews, 1980), as did Lars Nyberg, who found age differences for episodic but not semantic memory (Nyberg, Bäckman, Erngrund, Olofsson, & Nilsson, 1996). Nevertheless, under conditions of higher demand, semantic memory deficits appeared.…”
Section: Age Invariance In Specific Memory Domainsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Darlene Howard and colleagues showed comparable semantic memory as a function of age (e.g., Howard, Lasaga, & McAndrews, 1980), as did Lars Nyberg, who found age differences for episodic but not semantic memory (Nyberg, Bäckman, Erngrund, Olofsson, & Nilsson, 1996). Nevertheless, under conditions of higher demand, semantic memory deficits appeared.…”
Section: Age Invariance In Specific Memory Domainsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…There are some reports that old subjects are more prone to give bizarre and idiosyncratic responses in word association tasks, indicative of changes in the organization of the lexicon (Riegel, 1968;Perlmutter, 1978). On the other hand, Howard (1980) found no age differences in the variability of instances generated in response to category names. In view of these conflicting results, a prerequisite for examining age differences in contextual facilitation of word recognition is to ensure that the semantic relationships that are assumed to hold between context and target words actually do hold good for both old and young.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although age differences in favour of younger adults are observed in some semantic memory tasks in which a successful solution of the task is highly dependent on the subject's ability to initiate effortful, elaborate types of processing (e.g., Byrd, 1984) the dominating picture is that of no age differences in retrieval from semantic memory. Such data have been obtained in word recognition (Eysenck, 1975), semantic priming (Howard, McAndrews & Lasaga, 1981), Stroop tasks (Howard et al, 1980), PI-release (Elias & Hirasuna, 1976;Mistler-Lachman, 1977; Puglisi, 1980), classification speed (Mueller et al, 1980), naming latency (Thomas et al, 1977), lexical decision (Bowles & Poon, 1981) and continuous recognition (Poon & Fozard, 1980). Obviously, these results suggest that some of the cognitive abilities necessary for optimal performance in semantic memory tasks are relatively well preserved across the adult age span.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%