2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEM, AFM, EDX and XRD analysis of laser ablated Ti in nonreactive and reactive ambient environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 5, the characteristic diffraction peak of GO is at 10.98 • , which corresponds to the (002) plane [32]. The diffraction peaks of 35.13 • , 40.25 • , and 42.82 • are the characteristic peaks of Ti, corresponding to the (100), (002), and (101) planes, respectively [33]. It can be clearly seen that the characteristic peaks of Ti are still observed in the pattern of GO-Ti composite material, which indicates that the Nano-Ti particles have been successfully anchored on the GO surface.…”
Section: Structure and Morphology Of Go-ti Compositesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown in Figure 5, the characteristic diffraction peak of GO is at 10.98 • , which corresponds to the (002) plane [32]. The diffraction peaks of 35.13 • , 40.25 • , and 42.82 • are the characteristic peaks of Ti, corresponding to the (100), (002), and (101) planes, respectively [33]. It can be clearly seen that the characteristic peaks of Ti are still observed in the pattern of GO-Ti composite material, which indicates that the Nano-Ti particles have been successfully anchored on the GO surface.…”
Section: Structure and Morphology Of Go-ti Compositesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[38][39][40][41][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] The band gap value suggests that the material is electrically conductive (i.e. The band gap of the material was calculated to be 3.3 eV and 3.5 eV from uorescence and UV-visible data, respectively.…”
Section: View Article Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum yield of the 3MSA‐Ga 2 Te 3 quantum dot (0.90) , which was used as an imaging probe, was higher than that of rhodamine 6G (0.70) as expected. The quantum yields were calculated from equations reported in the literature . The results suggest that the nanodots have shown to be much more stable than fluorescent dyes as was observed in other results in addition to being much brighter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%