2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Supervised Deep Depth Denoising

Abstract: Depth perception is considered an invaluable source of information for various vision tasks. However, depth maps acquired using consumer-level sensors still suffer from non-negligible noise. This fact has recently motivated researchers to exploit traditional filters, as well as the deep learning paradigm, in order to suppress the aforementioned non-uniform noise, while preserving geometric details. Despite the effort, deep depth denoising is still an open challenge mainly due to the lack of clean data that cou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these raw depth images, we added Gaussian noise with a standard deviation of 5 cm and 10 cm. Then, we ran two traditional denoiser, PCL-SOR [ 50 ], and MatLab denoise function, in addition to some learning-based methods, PointCleanNet [ 44 ] and DeepDepthDenoising (DDD) [ 54 ], to obtain the predictions.…”
Section: Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these raw depth images, we added Gaussian noise with a standard deviation of 5 cm and 10 cm. Then, we ran two traditional denoiser, PCL-SOR [ 50 ], and MatLab denoise function, in addition to some learning-based methods, PointCleanNet [ 44 ] and DeepDepthDenoising (DDD) [ 54 ], to obtain the predictions.…”
Section: Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also analyzed the runtime of these methods. We gathered the testing results, and compared the performance of our method against the PCL-Sor [ 50 ], Matlab [ 55 ], PointCleanNet (or PCN) [ 44 ], and DDD [ 54 ] in Table 4 for the Chamfer distances, and in Table 5 for runtime comparison. Here, we note that although for the ground truth we used the PointCleanNet [ 44 ] noise removal module when we were comparing this method to others, we also performed the outlier removal module in tandem with the noise removal module.…”
Section: Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep depth denoising techniques (e.g., Ref. [58]) which can better capture the global context of each scene have attracted more attention.…”
Section: Depth Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task of image denoising is to recover the noisefree image x by removing the noise v from the given noisy image y. The existing denoising methods can be divided into two categories: image prior based methods [1]- [12], which obtain denoised image by processing the noisy image according to some prior knowledge about image; discriminative learning methods [13]- [24], which train a model to learn the mapping relationship from given noisy image to the denoised The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Min Xia .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%