2009
DOI: 10.26719/2009.15.1.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-reported needle-stick injuries among dentists in north Jordan

Abstract: The incidence of needle-stick injuries and the reporting attitudes among dentists in the north of Jordan were assessed with a cross-sectional survey. The study included 170 general dental practitioners (119 males and 51 females), of whom 113 (66.5%) were injured within the preceding 12 months. Needle-stick injury was significantly associated with higher age and a higher number of patients treated daily. Of those who were injured, 77.9% did not report the injury. Reasons for not reporting needle-stick injury we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
17
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A greater number of accidents, however, with fewer people seeking specialized assistance and serological monitoring were observed in other studies, such as reported by Veronesi et al, 29 in Italy, where they found 73% of accidents, with 28.2% not verifying seroconversion, and a maximum of 44.94% of awareness of risk of infection. As in the study by Khadar, 30 in Jordan, there was 66.50% of accidents, with only 22.10% reported lesions. Based on this, it is crucia to understand that implementation of available preventive measures and effective prophylactics interventions should be based on individual analysis of the risk of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A greater number of accidents, however, with fewer people seeking specialized assistance and serological monitoring were observed in other studies, such as reported by Veronesi et al, 29 in Italy, where they found 73% of accidents, with 28.2% not verifying seroconversion, and a maximum of 44.94% of awareness of risk of infection. As in the study by Khadar, 30 in Jordan, there was 66.50% of accidents, with only 22.10% reported lesions. Based on this, it is crucia to understand that implementation of available preventive measures and effective prophylactics interventions should be based on individual analysis of the risk of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[5] Similarly, NSIs possess a continuous risk of blood borne infections and is the source of occupational hazard for all the workers involved in the clinical field. [2,6,7] A study by Khader et al (2009) demonstrated that among the dentists in Jordan, NSIs were reportedly associated with age and number of patients treated per day. [8] It was found that 77.9 percent of dentists who got injured did not report the incidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,6,7] A study by Khader et al (2009) demonstrated that among the dentists in Jordan, NSIs were reportedly associated with age and number of patients treated per day. [8] It was found that 77.9 percent of dentists who got injured did not report the incidence. On the contrary, Jahangiri et al (2016) depicted that there was a subjective increase in the prevalence of NSIs among nursing students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor is inconsistent compliance with preventive measures like the use of gloves and the recapping of the used needles. Lack of handling skills and caution, freak accidents, and iatrogenic incidents often result in sharp injuries and exposure to contaminated body fluids [13,16,17]. Sometimes it could be the HOs' anxiety and stress levels [13,18], which may potentially increase the possibility of injuries [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%