2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-professional identity construction through other-identity deconstruction in Chinese televised debating discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, professional identity is taken as one's professional image, consisting of such attributes as professional role, professional expertise and professional ethics (cf. Li and Ran, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, professional identity is taken as one's professional image, consisting of such attributes as professional role, professional expertise and professional ethics (cf. Li and Ran, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopting the social-constructionist view of Bucholtz and Hall (2005), and using Spencer-Oatey's (2007) definition of identity, they take professional identity to mean 'one's professional self-image, consisting of such attributes as professional role, professional competence and professional ethics' (Li and Ran 2016: 48). Li and Ran (2016) demonstrate that professional identity will always be cognitive and social in nature regardless of whether it is construed individually, relationally or collectively. This means that people will form cognitive representations of their professional identity and negotiate and construct it in social interaction.…”
Section: Identity and Professional Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to the adjective 'professional', Boswood (1999) and Sullivan (2000) suggest that it carries particular expectations, such as high standards of competence, including superior knowledge and skills, and high standards of moral responsibility. In a recent study, Li and Ran (2016) develop this understanding of 'professional' to define professional identity. Adopting the social-constructionist view of Bucholtz and Hall (2005), and using Spencer-Oatey's (2007) definition of identity, they take professional identity to mean 'one's professional self-image, consisting of such attributes as professional role, professional competence and professional ethics' (Li and Ran 2016: 48).…”
Section: Identity and Professional Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this new theoretical tool gives rise to a number of interesting areas for further research, for example the comparison and contrast of (1) the synchronic identity constructed by interactants in everyday life, public spheres such as TV talk shows, and virtual worlds, because public and Internet pragmatic research display different discourse styles and features (Li & Ran, 2016;Kádár & Fukushima, 2018) and (2) the identity constructed by interlanguage and native language users, or by bilingual language users in their different languages (Ren, 2019;Reményi, 2017), etc. As the author mentions in Chapter 9, some inappropriate applications of pragmatic identity could result from a lack of knowledge of cultural variations (Spencer-Oatey, 2007), and therefore default pragmatic identities might differ from one culture to another.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%