2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-powered CsPbBr3 nanowire photodetector with a vertical structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once ITO NWs are incorporated into the device channel, the responsivity is greatly improved to 4.9 × 10 6 A W −1 . Notably, this responsivity is already 5 orders of magnitude higher than the ones of typical IPH photodetectors using photovoltaic structures, and 2 orders of magnitude higher than those of CsPbBr 3 ‐based photogating devices . At the same time, it is also critical to assess the response time of the devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once ITO NWs are incorporated into the device channel, the responsivity is greatly improved to 4.9 × 10 6 A W −1 . Notably, this responsivity is already 5 orders of magnitude higher than the ones of typical IPH photodetectors using photovoltaic structures, and 2 orders of magnitude higher than those of CsPbBr 3 ‐based photogating devices . At the same time, it is also critical to assess the response time of the devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With the improved material stability, most of the early works focused on the fabrication of IHP photodetectors utilizing the photovoltaic device structure. Owing to the poor conductivity of IHPS as well as the lack of appropriate photogain mechanism, the obtained IHP devices usually exhibit low responsivities ( R ) with the values of ≈10 −1 to 10 1 A W −1 , making the detection of weak optical signals difficult. To solve this problem, one alternative way is to employ the hybrid phototransistor structure by combining a high‐mobility conducting layer with a perovskite light absorption layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably because the bias voltage will not only increase the photocurrent but also enhance the dark current. The maximum value of R increases from 473 mA W −1 at 0 V to 977 mA W −1 at 1 V. To meet the requirements of photodetection in a wide light intensity range, the linear dynamic range (LDR) is an important figure‐of‐merit, which is given by the following formula [ 40 ] LDR= 20logJphJd where J ph and J d represent the photocurrent and dark current density, respectively. As shown in Figure 3e, the NIO device exhibits a broad linear response range from 0.22 µW cm −2 to 80 mW cm −2 , and the measured LDR can reach 110 dB, while the theoretical LDR calculated by dark current density even attain 131 dB.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the bandgap and carrier lifetime experiment values of CsPbI x Br 3− x are acquired from literatures. [ 35–42 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%