Self-Piercing Riveted Joint of Vibration-Damping Steel and Aluminum Alloy

Kam, Dong-Hyuck; Jeong, Taek-Eon; Kim, Min; Shin, Jungyeop

doi:10.3390/app9214575

Cited by 15 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(38 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The interlock is critical for the mechanical strengths and failure behaviours of SPR joints. Too small interlock values may result in pull-out failure of the rivet shank from the bottom sheet [9]. The Tmin is very important for the corrosion resistance and water-proof performance of SPR joints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling and interaction analysis of the self-pierce riveting process using regression analysis and FEA

Zhao

Han

Liu

et al. 2021

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling and interaction analysis of the self-pierce riveting process using regression analysis and FEA

Zhao

Han

Liu

et al. 2021

Int J Adv Manuf Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ma et al 14) demonstrated the joinability of aluminum alloys with different gauges to mild steel sheets. Kam et al 15) illustrated the feasibility of SPR joints between vibration-damping steel (consisting of two steel sheets separated by a viscoelastic adhesive polymer layer) and an aluminum alloy. Zhang et al 16) observed that the strength of the steel significantly influenced the strength of steel/aluminum SPR joints.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Top Sheet Materials on Joint Performance of Self-Piercing Riveting

Karim

Murugan

Bae³

et al. 2022

J Weld Join

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three types of self-piercing riveting (SPR) joints, i.e., steel/aluminum, carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)/ aluminum, and aluminum/aluminum, were constructed using three different top sheet materials with the same aluminum alloy as the bottom sheet. The effects of the top sheet material on the joint quality and mechanical behavior were evaluated. The top sheet materials’ characteristics dominate the rivet piercing process and the consequent interlock distance. The high-strength steel top sheet requires a comparatively higher rivet setting force and induces early flaring of the rivet tail, resulting in a larger interlock distance. Though the CFRP needs the highest rivet setting force to penetrate the rivet through the CFRP fibers, the CFRP/aluminum joint exhibits the smallest interlock distance because of the SPR process-induced damages to the CFRP and subsequently less flaring of the rivet tail. In strength tests, the damaged CFRP sheet resulted in rivet head pullout of the CFRP/aluminum joints, which exhibited the lowest lap-shear and cross-tension strengths. In contrast, the steel/aluminum joints demonstrated the highest strengths because of their comparatively larger interlock distances. In addition to the experimental analysis, simulations revealed the rivet penetration and flaring mechanisms with various top sheet materials, and their respective joint quality and strengths.

show abstract

“…Other authors [ 10 , 12 ] carried out fatigue and static strength on cross-shaped SFR joints with aluminum alloy plates at various loading angles. Kam et al [ 13 ] reported the type of effect of die type and joint configuration on mechanical performance, failure mode, and geometrical characteristics on SPR joints of steel and aluminum alloy. The SPR joint between dissimilar material combinations was also experimentally studied by Taek-Eon Jeong and Xiaocong He [ 14 , 15 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material Model Effect for Simulating a Single-Lap Joint with a Blind Rivet

Lubas

Bednarz

2021

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper concerns the influence of the material modeling method on the results of strength analyses. The research object was a single lap joint with a blind rivet (ISO 12996). The results of numerical strength analysis for various configurations of material models with material and contact nonlinearity were compared not only with the experimental results of such a connection but also with the values estimated using classical analytical tools (pressure stress and Hertz stress). The research aimed to determine how the results of numerical analyses (FEMs) were influenced by the method of modeling the material model and how it relates to the experimental results. As part of the analyses, a discrete riveted model and material models were constructed. The analyses took into account various load cases (from 10 to 90% of the connection capacity) to better illustrate the relationship between the numerical and experimental results. As a result of the conducted analyses, it was determined that the linear-elastic model was an acceptable and suggested solution (with a load of up to 90% of the load capacity of the joint connection) for further tests. The work was summarized with general and specific conclusions relating to all cases of numerical modeling. In addition, the summary includes suggestions for future works.

show abstract

Self-Piercing Riveted Joint of Vibration-Damping Steel and Aluminum Alloy

Cited by 15 publications

References 24 publications

Modelling and interaction analysis of the self-pierce riveting process using regression analysis and FEA

Modelling and interaction analysis of the self-pierce riveting process using regression analysis and FEA

Effect of Top Sheet Materials on Joint Performance of Self-Piercing Riveting

Material Model Effect for Simulating a Single-Lap Joint with a Blind Rivet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About