1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(98)01282-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self organization of Ge dots on Si substrates: influence of misorientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, this unusual behaviour has not been observed yet. It is important to note that, Ge or Si-Ge strained islands can develop asymmetric shapes on vicinal substrates during growth [43] which resemble those observed in our samples after laser annealing. However, the required substrate misorientation is of the order of 10 • whereas our substrate is oriented within 1 • .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As far as we know, this unusual behaviour has not been observed yet. It is important to note that, Ge or Si-Ge strained islands can develop asymmetric shapes on vicinal substrates during growth [43] which resemble those observed in our samples after laser annealing. However, the required substrate misorientation is of the order of 10 • whereas our substrate is oriented within 1 • .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We have used mainly two different processes in order to produce self-organized nanostructures with better A/L control. The first process consists of depositing Ge ML on a self-patterned Si 1−x Ge x template layer [27,81]. Self-patterning results from the stress-driven instability detailed upper [7].…”
Section: Self-organization Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample used was similar to the AFM sample, but contained ten layers of quantum dots separated by Si layers. A different sample, with five layers of quantum dots on Si 0.6 Ge 0.4 template layers, used in order to improve the dot size distribution [6], was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning TEM (STEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). The spatial resolution of the STEM and EDX analysis was estimated to be 2 nm [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%