2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-9955-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Objectification and Pregnancy: Are Body Functionality Dimensions Protective?

Abstract: Objectification theory contends that women are socialized to view their body as an object to be evaluated by others (Fredickson and Roberts 1997). In contrast, pregnancy may be a time that women are more attuned to their body's functionality. Extending objectification theory, we investigate relationships among body surveillance, awareness and appreciation of body functionality, depressive symptoms, and prenatal health behaviors among an online sample of 156 predominantly White, middle-class pregnant women from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These articles discuss how these gendered body ideals restrict the following: women's ability to have deep connections with their friends and partners as they talk about their bodies in disparaging ways (Payne et al 2010), men's perceptions of female athletes based on their attire and body positioning (Daniels and Wartena 2011), same-sex individuals' perceptions of themselves as parents (Pacilli et al 2011), pregnant women's freedoms (Sutton et al 2010) and perceptions of their bodies during pregnancy (Rubin and Steinberg 2011), African Americans' body image and self-esteem (Oney et al 2011), and older adult women's self-image and presence in the media (Hine 2011).…”
Section: Stream Two: Gendered Body Constrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These articles discuss how these gendered body ideals restrict the following: women's ability to have deep connections with their friends and partners as they talk about their bodies in disparaging ways (Payne et al 2010), men's perceptions of female athletes based on their attire and body positioning (Daniels and Wartena 2011), same-sex individuals' perceptions of themselves as parents (Pacilli et al 2011), pregnant women's freedoms (Sutton et al 2010) and perceptions of their bodies during pregnancy (Rubin and Steinberg 2011), African Americans' body image and self-esteem (Oney et al 2011), and older adult women's self-image and presence in the media (Hine 2011).…”
Section: Stream Two: Gendered Body Constrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, women who do not hold themselves up to this unrealistically thin standard may focus on and appreciate their body's functionality during pregnancy and not experience diminished body satisfaction (Skouteris et al 2005). Rubin and Steinberg (2011) investigated the links between body surveillance, awareness and appreciation of body functionality, depressive symptoms, and prenatal health behaviors among an online sample of pregnant women from the U.S. Whereas higher body surveillance was related to more depressive symptoms and marginally related to engagement in unhealthy prenatal behaviors, awareness and appreciation of body functionality were each associated with fewer depressive symptoms and lower engagement in unhealthy prenatal behaviors.…”
Section: Stream Two: Gendered Body Constrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 20-item Prenatal Health Behavior Scale (PHBS) is a self-report measure first introduced 20 years ago [20] and used in numerous studies since [2128] to assess health-relevant behaviors in pregnancy, including smoking, diet, prenatal vitamin use, sleep, and exercise. Initially, the PHBS was used as a unidimensional scale, scored by reversing unhealthful items and combining these with healthful items (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%