2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0042-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiction, Fashion, and Function Finale: An Introduction and Conclusion to the Special Issue on Gendered Body Image, Part III

Abstract: Culture specifies standards for women's and men's body appearance and display. In Western cultures, these standards are both concentrated and ubiquitous in the media, represented as gendered body ideals for citizens to aspire toward. Because gendered body ideals are revered, individuals try to construct and portray their body consistently with these ideals. Furthermore, because gendered body ideals are narrowly defined and restrictive, individuals constrict their behavior, relationships, and perceptions of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguably, the deification of the body has characterized Western cultures in the 21 st century, thereby causing the body to become a main element of gender identity. The human form has been subjected to a gendered standard of beauty (for a review see Calogero & Tylka, 2010; Tylka & Calogero, 2010, 2011), and these deep-seated norms have imposed preconceived reference points, leaving little room for other body types (Butler, 1990). As such, human bodies are compared to beauty standards and “are not allowed to naturally develop into a diverse range of shapes, sizes, and attributes” (Calogero & Tylka, 2010, p. 1), instead stigmatizing fat body types (Murray, 2005, 2008; Puhl & Latner, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguably, the deification of the body has characterized Western cultures in the 21 st century, thereby causing the body to become a main element of gender identity. The human form has been subjected to a gendered standard of beauty (for a review see Calogero & Tylka, 2010; Tylka & Calogero, 2010, 2011), and these deep-seated norms have imposed preconceived reference points, leaving little room for other body types (Butler, 1990). As such, human bodies are compared to beauty standards and “are not allowed to naturally develop into a diverse range of shapes, sizes, and attributes” (Calogero & Tylka, 2010, p. 1), instead stigmatizing fat body types (Murray, 2005, 2008; Puhl & Latner, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, I have faced a slew of other challenges to my self-concept and ability to articulate it to others that my male-assigned peers often have not. Just as athletic pursuits are considered a marker of virility and thus worth in male-looking people, similar pressures apply to female-looking patients with respect to physiognomy (Tylka and Calogero 2011). Whereas U.S. residents who are assigned male at birth are often expected to become sturdy and muscular as they grow, those assigned female face similarly strong expectations to stay slender, but not too slender (Paechter 2006).…”
Section: The Female and The Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, I have faced a slew of other challenges to my self-concept and ability to articulate it to others that my male-assigned peers often have not. Just as athletic pursuits are considered a marker of virility and thus worth in male-looking people, similar pressures apply to female-looking patients with respect to physiognomy (Tylka & Calogero 2011). Whereas US residents who are assigned male at birth are often expected to become sturdy and muscular as they grow, those assigned female face similarly strong expectations to stay slender-but not too slender (Paechter 2006).…”
Section: The Female and The Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%