2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2015.7409678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-heating on bulk FinFET from 14nm down to 7nm node

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to being multiple-time programmable (MTP), CTT based memory offers a better alternative to existing onetime programmable (OTP) technologies like eFUSE [2] and gate breakdown anti-fuse [3] as it can be used more effectively for yield improvement, field configurability, performance tailoring, and security enhancements such as chip IDs and onchip reconfigurable encryption key and firmware storage with lower power, higher density, and higher scalability, at no additional processing cost. This intrinsic self-heating enhanced charge trapping memory solution is applicable to SOI as well as bulk FinFET technologies as self-heating in bulk FinFETs, while generally less than SOI FinFETs, is comparable to SOI planar devices and increases considerably with scaling [4], [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to being multiple-time programmable (MTP), CTT based memory offers a better alternative to existing onetime programmable (OTP) technologies like eFUSE [2] and gate breakdown anti-fuse [3] as it can be used more effectively for yield improvement, field configurability, performance tailoring, and security enhancements such as chip IDs and onchip reconfigurable encryption key and firmware storage with lower power, higher density, and higher scalability, at no additional processing cost. This intrinsic self-heating enhanced charge trapping memory solution is applicable to SOI as well as bulk FinFET technologies as self-heating in bulk FinFETs, while generally less than SOI FinFETs, is comparable to SOI planar devices and increases considerably with scaling [4], [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, recent HCD studies of FinFET devices predict lifetime through simple compact modeling based on measurements [9], [10]. In addition, as the channel thickness decreases, the self-heating effect becomes more severe and the influence of temperature on HCD increases [11]. However, few studies analyze HCD through fundamental physical mechanisms, and many researches are focused on empirical modeling based on measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D device structures such as Fin-FETs, nanowires [7][8][9][10][11][12] are used to strengthen the electrostatic control and improve the subthreshold properties. However, serious self-heating effects (SHE) are predictable [13][14][15][16][17][18] due to new materials and non-planar structures. For Germanium, bulk thermal conductivity is 53 W/m/K [19], lower than Silicon (148 W/m/K) [19], which means a weaker ability to dissipate heat out of hotspots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more serious SHE can be expected in Ge FinFETs than in Si FinFETs. Although some experimental studies have shown serious SHEs in Ge FinFETs [15,20], the systematical investigation of geometry impact on self-heating in Ge FinFETs is not yet reported. In this work, 3D electro-thermal device simulations are performed to investigate the SHE in the 14 nm Ge p-channel FinFETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%