2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self healing capacity of geosynthetic clay liners and influencing factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of overburden pressure () and apparent permittivity () of the damage holes with different size have been reported by Sari and Chai 14) already. In this study, the effect of the types of liquid is investigated mainly under the condition of diameter …”
Section: (3) Conditions Investigatedsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of overburden pressure () and apparent permittivity () of the damage holes with different size have been reported by Sari and Chai 14) already. In this study, the effect of the types of liquid is investigated mainly under the condition of diameter …”
Section: (3) Conditions Investigatedsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…of CaCl 2 case is almost 2 orders higher than that of the ethanol case. To further quantify the self-healing capacity, a parameter of area healing ratio ( h ) is defined as 14) :…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Sari and Chai (2013) showed that bentonite-free holes, 40 and 50 mm in diameter, did not self-heal (after permeation with tap water at a normal stress of 200 kPa) in a geotextile encased, needle-punched, thermally treated GCL (with a slit-film woven lower geotextile and nonwoven upper geotextile and granular bentonite). As a result, the most significant implication of the observed erosion features would be the loss of the low permeable component of the composite GMB/GCL liner which would negatively impact the potential leakage rates through the composite liner if a hole were to occur at or near the erosion feature.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous laboratory investigations have examined the effect of several factors on the hydraulic performance of GCLs such as cation exchange, interaction with different permeants, wet-dry cycles, and freeze-thaw cycles (e.g., Shan and Daniel 1991;Boardman and Daniel 1996;Petrov and Rowe 1997;Lin and Benson 2000;Shackelford et al 2000Shackelford et al , 2010Jo et al 2005;Lee et al 2005;Rowe et al 2006;Bouazza et al 2007;Brown and Shackelford 2007;Benson and Meer 2009;Lange et al 2010;Rosin-Paumier et al 2011;Rosin-Paumier and Touze-Foltz 2012;Rowe and Abdelatty 2012;Bradshaw et al 2013Bradshaw et al , 2016Mazzieri et al 2013;Rowe and Hosney 2013;Sari and Chai 2013). There have been far fewer studies examining the hydraulic performance of GCLs after a period of field exposure in applications such as covers or caps under low applied stress and these studies have given rise to some apparently inconsistent findings as discussed below (James et al 1997;Benson et al 2007Benson et al , 2010Meer and Benson 2007;Benson 2010a, 2011;Buckley et al 2012;Hosney and Rowe 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%