Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents’ Body Fat

Abstract

BackgroundThe superiority of an intervention combining two sets of theory-based behavior change techniques targeting planning and self-efficacy over an intervention targeting planning only or self-efficacy only has rarely been investigated.PurposeWe compared the influence of self-efficacy, planning, and self-efficacy+planning interventions with an education-based control condition on adolescents’ body fat, assuming mediating effects of respective social cognitive variables and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The moderating role of the built environment was examined.MethodsParticipants (N = 1217, aged 14–18 years) were randomly assigned to four conditions: planning (n = 270), self-efficacy (n = 311), self-efficacy+planning (n = 351), and control (n = 285). The measurement was conducted at baseline (T1), two-month follow-up (T2), and fourteen-month follow-up (T3). Interventions/control group procedures were delivered at T1 and T2. Percent of body fat tissue (measured at T1 and T3) was the main outcome. Social cognitive mediators (self-efficacy and planning) were assessed at T1 and T2. The behavioral mediator (MVPA) and the presence of built MVPA facilities (the moderator) were evaluated at T1 and T3.ResultsSimilar small increases of body fat were found across the three intervention groups, but the increment of body fat was significantly larger in the control group. On average, differences between control and intervention groups translated to approximately 1% of body fat. Effects of the interventions on body fat were mediated by relevant social cognitive variables and MVPA. A lower increase of body fat was found among intervention group participants who had access to newly-built MVPA facilities.ConclusionsWe found no superiority of an intervention targeting two social cognitive variables over the intervention targeting one cognition only.

Changing people’s attitudes and beliefs toward driving through floodwaters: Evaluation of a video infographic

“…As the current infographic did not only focus on fear-inducing messages, but also included clear-stated messages of specific behaviours to prevent the negative outcomes of driving through floodwaters, we expected the infographic to deliver longer-term changes in beliefs and intentions. There is also precedent for long-term belief change based on messages aimed at inducing changes in self-efficacy over time in health behaviour contexts (Luszczynska et al, 2016).…”

An Examination of Factors Associated With Self-Efficacy for Food Choice and Healthy Eating among Low-Income Adolescents in Three U.S. States

“…Studies show a correlation between self-efficacy and increasing physical activity among adolescent girls (Dishman et al, 2004;Verloigne et al, 2016) and, with proper planning of interventions, it impacts one's intake of fruit and vegetables and reduces one's intake of energy-dense food (Luszczynska et al, 2016). Establishing healthy habits during adolescence is important, given that eating behavior that is likely to cause fatness is actively adopted during this age (Lytle et al, 2000), while consumption of fruits and vegetables, which has immediate and long-term health-protective benefits, is likely to decline (Neumark-Sztainer et al, 2003;Pearson et al, 2011).…”

Perceptions of Physical Activity Promotion, Transportation Support, Physical Activity, and Body Mass: an Insight into Parent-Child Dyadic Processes

“…However, there is evidence that the single items may serve as valid and useful measures [ 40 ]. Experimental research conducted among adolescents showed that interventions targeting individual’s beliefs predicted a reduction of body mass, but this effect may depend on the actual presence of built PA facilities in the local community/school environment [ 41 ]. Therefore, future research explaining overweight/obesity among young people may need to address individual-level predictors combined with a socio-ecological model [ 41 ].…”