Self‐efficacy and goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in people following hospitalization: A prospective study

Orbell, Sheina; Johnston, Marie; Rowley, D.I.; Davey, Peter; Espley, Arthur

doi:10.1348/135910701169034

Cited by 64 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus the present 8 study adds further support that goal importance or valence should be regarded as an important 9 variable in influencing goal progress. 10 The interaction in the present study also differed to that of Orbell et al (2001) findings. 11 Orbell et al found that high levels of self-efficacy had a strong impact upon progress in mobility 12 regardless of goal importance.…”

contrasting

confidence: 85%

A longitudinal examination of the interactive effects of goal importance and self-efficacy upon multiple life goal progress.

Beattie¹,

Hardy²,

Woodman³

2015

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

contrasting

confidence: 85%

A longitudinal examination of the interactive effects of goal importance and self-efficacy upon multiple life goal progress.

Beattie¹,

Hardy²,

Woodman³

2015

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, following stroke, perceived control over recovery predicted change in disability when controlling for impairment and other clinical variables (Johnston, Morrison, MacWalter & Partridge, 1999;Partridge & Johnston, 1989), and predicted recovery after three years (Johnston, Pollard, Morrison & MacWalter, 2004). Self-efficacy and perceived behavioral control (PBC) predicted disability and recovery from stroke six months after discharge (Bonetti & Johnston, 2008), and in orthopedic patients self-efficacy to perform activities of daily living predicted disability after joint replacement (Orbell, Johnston, Rowley, Davey & Espley, 2001). …”

Section: Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing the integration of ICF and behavioral models of disability in orthopedic patients: Replication and extension.

Quinn¹,

Johnston²,

Dixon³

et al. 2012

Rehabilitation Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Disability from chronic illness is a major problem for society, yet the study of its determinants lacks an overall theoretical paradigm. Johnston (1996) has proposed conceptualizing disability as behavior and integrating biomedical and behavioral predictors. Dixon, Johnston, Rowley, and Pollard (2008) tested a model including constructs from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the theory of planned behavior (TPB) using structural equation modeling; it fitted better and explained more variance than the ICF or TPB alone. We replicated their study with a new sample from the same population (orthopedic patients awaiting joint replacement) and also tested the model after the patients had surgery. Methods: Two weeks before surgery, 342 orthopedic patients who had joint pain (most with arthritis) completed a questionnaire, with 228 completing it again 1 year after surgery. The authors tested Dixon et al.'s best-fit models cross-sectionally (before and after surgery) and assessed the goodness of fit of these imposed models to our data using structural equation modeling. Results: Findings strongly supported those of Dixon et al. Before surgery, results were very similar to Dixon et al. with all models accounting for significant variance and fitting well, but the integrated model fitted better and accounted for more variance. One year after surgery, Dixon et al.'s models showed even stronger fit to the data. Conclusions: Although behavioral and biomedical (ICF) models were supported, the integrated model provided a better explanation of disability in this population than either of these models alone and suggests biopsychosocial interventions to reduce disability.

show abstract

“…In general, studies indicate that higher SE for pain shares a positive relation with functional ability and adjustment to chronic pain [146][147][148], and mediates the relation between pain and disability [149], pain and depression [150], and life stress and headache [151]. Clinical investigations indicate that SE for pain is associated with lower pain intensity [148,152], and less severe pain-related distress and disability [95,153,154]. In prospective studies, SE predicts outcomes for post-surgical pain rehabilitation [144,155].…”

Section: Interventional Pain Medicine and Pain Beliefsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventional pain medicine: retreat from the biopsychosocial model of pain

Roth

Geisser

Williams

2011

Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of pain medicine has shifted from multidisciplinary rehabilitation to procedure-focused interventional pain medicine (IPM). Considerable controversy exists regarding the efficacy of IPM and its more narrow focus on nociception as an exclusive target of pain treatment. This topical review aims to examine pain research and treatment outcome studies that support a biopsychosocial model of pain, and to critique the clinical practice of IPM given its departure from the premises of a biopsychosocial model. A modern definition of pain and findings from clinical and basic science studies indicate that pain-related psychological factors are integral to pain perception. The clinical viability of IPM is challenged based upon its biomedical view of peripheral nociception as a primary source of pain and the potential of this viewpoint to foster maladaptive pain attributions and discourage the use of pain coping strategies among chronic pain patients. IPM should adopt a biopsychosocial perspective on pain and operate within a framework of multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation to improve its effectiveness. KEYWORDS

show abstract

Self‐efficacy and goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in people following hospitalization: A prospective study

Cited by 64 publications

References 27 publications

A longitudinal examination of the interactive effects of goal importance and self-efficacy upon multiple life goal progress.

A longitudinal examination of the interactive effects of goal importance and self-efficacy upon multiple life goal progress.

Testing the integration of ICF and behavioral models of disability in orthopedic patients: Replication and extension.

Interventional pain medicine: retreat from the biopsychosocial model of pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About