1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(96)00191-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-disclosure and the treatment of substance abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two thirds of our anonymous sample have not disclosed their lived experience to any of their patients. Appropriate, responsible self-disclosure has been shown to be a powerful and positive tool in psychotherapy (Henretty & Levitt, 2010; Somers, Pomerantz, Meeks, & Pawlow, 2014) and has a long tradition in the addictions field (Dilts, Clark, & Harmon, 1997; Doyle, 1997; Mallow, 1998). Prosumers who have disclosed serve as evidence to colleagues and patients that meaningful mental health recovery is quite possible. Accommodation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two thirds of our anonymous sample have not disclosed their lived experience to any of their patients. Appropriate, responsible self-disclosure has been shown to be a powerful and positive tool in psychotherapy (Henretty & Levitt, 2010; Somers, Pomerantz, Meeks, & Pawlow, 2014) and has a long tradition in the addictions field (Dilts, Clark, & Harmon, 1997; Doyle, 1997; Mallow, 1998). Prosumers who have disclosed serve as evidence to colleagues and patients that meaningful mental health recovery is quite possible. Accommodation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In criminal justice research, self-disclosure has been researched primarily in literature related to the effective supervision of adult and juvenile offenders in the community, as well as work with drug using offenders and sex offenders (Dilts, Clark, & Harmon, 1997; Hartz & Thick, 2005; Ward, Hudson, & Marshall, 1996). However, much of this research is speculative in nature.…”
Section: Self-disclosure In Criminal Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…그러나 이런 자기 공개로 인해 상담자와 내담자의 관계가 공식적이고 전문적인 관계보다 점점 개인적이게 될 위험이 커진다[5]. 또한 이런 자기 공개가 내담자에게 초점을 두던 것에서 초점이 흐려지거나 상담자에게 옮겨질 수 있으며[29], 어떤 내담자들은 상담자가 회복자라는 것에 당황하고, 때로는 상담자와 경쟁하는 느낌을 갖는 내담자도 있다[30]. 또한 내담자에게 영향을 주기 위해서나, 인정을 받기 위해, 또는 개인적인 만족을 위해 자기 공개하는 것은 상담자와 내담자의 관계를 해치게 된다[20].결국 자기 공개는 내담자의 복지를 위해 사용되어야 한다.…”
unclassified