2007
DOI: 10.1080/15534510701279722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐construal and values expressed in advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is congruent to the results of previous studies (Agrawal & Maheswaran, 2005;Sung & Choi, 2011;van Baaren & Ruivenkamp, 2007;Wang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2011) that individual preferred advertising appeal that are congruent with their self-construal to influence toward brand attitude. A reason might account for the differentiation of perception of brand personality for the players with different levels of selfconstrual in the effectiveness of advergame.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is congruent to the results of previous studies (Agrawal & Maheswaran, 2005;Sung & Choi, 2011;van Baaren & Ruivenkamp, 2007;Wang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2011) that individual preferred advertising appeal that are congruent with their self-construal to influence toward brand attitude. A reason might account for the differentiation of perception of brand personality for the players with different levels of selfconstrual in the effectiveness of advergame.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Due to selfconstrual reflects the extent to which individuals view themselves either as individualists or collectivists, adopting advertising appeal on individualism or collectivism may affects individuals with interdependent or independent self-construal toward brand (Agrawal & Maheswaran, 2005). Prior research of self-construal have heavily examined the advertising formats and focused on aspects such as attitudes toward advertising messages and advocated brands (Sung & Choi, 2011), value express and brand choice (van Baaren & Ruivenkamp, 2007), preferences of cobrand personality (Monga & Lau-Gesk, 2007), advertising appeal and generation X (Zhang, 2009), advertising and product involvement (Zhang, Moore & Moore, 2011). Though theses investigations have delved understand advertising effectiveness, the influence of consumer individual difference have also garnered attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That consumers' SC alters the perception of the symbolic value of brands adds to a body of literature that describes the impact of SC on values expressed in advertisement (van Baaren and Ruivenkamp 2007) and more broadly perception and cognition (Nisbett 2010;Kastanakis and Voyer 2014). To our best knowledge, however, we are the first to demonstrate that SC can alter consumers' brand perception in general.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, they may be less motivated to correct for the presumed bias as value-laden advertising may signal to consumers how much importance their society attaches to these values. After all, given that ads are more persuasive when they appeal to the values of the audience (Nelson et al 2006;Van Baaren and Ruivenkamp 2007), it makes sense that advertisers make use of values that are shared by as many consumers as possible. In sum, consumers who view advertising as informative may be less motivated to reduce the possible bias and therefore assimilate to the 'advertised' values.…”
Section: Advertising As a Situational Cuementioning
confidence: 99%