PsycTESTS Dataset 1996
DOI: 10.1037/t01115-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Concept Clarity Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
64
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the outlying item loaded very low on this forced factor. The present results are not alien to those in the original scale development research by Campbell et al (1996): In some of their data sets, they too reported a minor second factor (with eigenvalue close to 1.0). As did Campbell et al, so did the present authors decide to compute the SCC score by aggregating all 12 items.…”
Section: Sample Demographicscontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the outlying item loaded very low on this forced factor. The present results are not alien to those in the original scale development research by Campbell et al (1996): In some of their data sets, they too reported a minor second factor (with eigenvalue close to 1.0). As did Campbell et al, so did the present authors decide to compute the SCC score by aggregating all 12 items.…”
Section: Sample Demographicscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The survey questionnaire used the original 12-item Social-concept Clarity (SCC) scale (Campbell et al, 1996). Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence (SUSCEP) was measured with the 12-item Bearden et al scale (1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the responsiveness of one's self-concept to external influences is dependent on the clarity of one's self-concept. Self-concept clarity refers to the extent to which one's beliefs about one's attributes are clear, confidently held,internally consistent, stable, and cognitively accessible (Campbell, 1990;Campbell, Trapnell, Heine, Katz, Lavalee, & Lehman, 1996). My research examining self-concept clarity indicates that people have much higher clarity about their CQs than about their SCs: CQ self-concepts are more extreme, more confidently held, and more internally consistent than SC self-concepts, and people show less deviation between general and situation-specific self-beliefs for CQs than for SCs following an actual social interaction .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Canadians reported having a clearer sense of who they are than Japanese (Campbell et al, 1996). In addition, Koreans' self-evaluation changed to a larger extent than Americans', depending on the question asked (e.g., how "extraverted" versus how "introverted" are you?…”
Section: Self-concept and Culturementioning
confidence: 99%