While polymers hold significant potential as low cost, mechanically flexible, lightweight large area photovoltaics and light emitting devices (OLEDs), their performance relies crucially on understanding and controlling the morphology on the nanometer scale. The ca. 10 nm length scale of exciton diffusion sets the patterning length scale necessary to affect charge separation and overall efficiency in photovoltaics. Moreover, the imbalance of electron and hole mobilities in most organic materials necessitates the use of multiple components in many device architectures. These requirements for 10 nm length scale patterning in large area, solution processed devices suggest that block copolymer strategies previously employed for more classical, insulating polymer systems may be very useful in organic electronics. This Perspective seeks to describe both the synthesis and self-assembly of block copolymers for organic optoelectronics. Device characterization of these inherently complex active layers remains a significant challenge and is also discussed.Optimization of organic photovoltaics and light emitting devices relies on controlling the nanoscale morphology of at least two semiconducting materials with different energy level alignments to maximize charge separation, recombination, and transfer. 1,2 The necessity for nanoscale pattern control is most easily exemplified in organic solar cells. These devices are generally made of two materials: an electron donating (p-type) component in which light is absorbed to create an exciton (bound electron-hole pair) and an electron accepting (n-type) component which accepts the electron from the donor. In this scheme, an electron accepting material is a material with lower HOMO and LUMO energy levels than the electron donor. The HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) and LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) are analogous to the valence and conduction bands often used to describe inorganic semiconductors. When light is absorbed by the material, an electron may be excited from the HOMO (lower energy) to the LUMO (higher energy) with the energy difference between these two energy levels referred to as the band gap. For example, P3HT is commonly used as the predominant light absorber in efficient organic photovoltaics and has a band gap of around 1.85 eV (λ ≈ 675 nm). Tuning the band gap energy is important for the optimization of the device performance because photons with less energy than the band gap will not be captured and any energy that photons carry greater than the band gap will be lost when the excited electron relaxes to the HOMO energy level. On the basis of the solar spectrum, assuming an ideal device, a band gap of around 1.4 eV gives the theoretical maximum efficiency of around 33%.After photoexcitation and charge separation the electron and hole are then transported back to the appropriate electrodes through the accepting and donating domains, respectively. This process dictates strict geometrical requirements on the device: the donor-acceptor interfaces mus...