2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembly carbon dots for powerful solar water evaporation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated peak evaporation rate as shown in Figure 7 between 13:00 P.M -15:00 P.M were 1.9 kg/m 2 -h and 2.5 kg/m 2 -h for samples with granular activated carbon and nanoparticles, while that of pure DI water was 1.2 kg/m 2 -h. These results are consistent with some of the recently developed solar absorbing materials that have shown 1 sun evaporation rates in the range of 2.06-2.27 kg/m 2 -h [25][26][27] in a controlled atmosphere under solar simulator and closed environment. It is to be noted higher evaporation rate could be a result of higher ambient temperatures.…”
Section: Outdoor Experimentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The calculated peak evaporation rate as shown in Figure 7 between 13:00 P.M -15:00 P.M were 1.9 kg/m 2 -h and 2.5 kg/m 2 -h for samples with granular activated carbon and nanoparticles, while that of pure DI water was 1.2 kg/m 2 -h. These results are consistent with some of the recently developed solar absorbing materials that have shown 1 sun evaporation rates in the range of 2.06-2.27 kg/m 2 -h [25][26][27] in a controlled atmosphere under solar simulator and closed environment. It is to be noted higher evaporation rate could be a result of higher ambient temperatures.…”
Section: Outdoor Experimentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For the 2PF 1 /Cu‐PC membrane with superior water transport‐controlling performance, the water film around the carbon cells is greatly reduced, and the skeletons of the carbon cells are exposed for direct solar evaporation, which further turns the curve surface evaporation mode of 1PF 1 /Cu‐PC membrane into micropore evaporation mode. Based on the classic phase transition theory, the required energy for pure water vaporization into gas molecules can be expressed by (detailed derivation is shown in the Supporting Information, Notes S1) [ 8a,17 ] normalΔvapHm= Ulinter+RTpVl where Ulinter (J mol −1 ) is the intermolecular potential of liquid water, R is the molar gas constant, T (K) is the temperature, p (Pa) is the pressure, and V l (m 3 mol −1 ) is the volume of the liquid water. The last term pV l is always neglected because the volume of the liquid water is much smaller than the volume of vapor for the same amount of molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface tension‐driven pressure is expressed by the following equation [ 8b,18 ] ΔP = 4σcosθ/r where σ is the air–liquid surface tension, θ is the contact angle, and r is the pore radius. With Equation (), Equation () can be defined as [ 17,19 ] normalΔvapHm= Ulinter+[]RTp+4σcosθ/rVl …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1,12,21,25,26 ] Another factor may be ascribed to invalid solar‐to‐heat conversion of the photothermal materials, i.e., a part of photoinduced heat hardly enables water to become vapor. [ 21,27 ] Therefore, an increasing trend toward the design of high‐efficiency solar photothermal materials for improving ER has attracted a huge amount of attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%