2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembly and sedimentation of 5 nm SPIONs using horizontal, high magnetic fields and gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the micro-QMS exhibits an outstandingly improved efficiency, which substantiates its potential for being used for the recovery of magnetic beads when relatively high flow rates are required. These flow rates can be further increased by using higher magnetic field gradients, such as the ones considered in several QMSs published in the literature, namely, 300 T·m –1 or 1750 T·m –1 . , Assuming that these magnetic gradients can be ensured in the micro-QMS presented here (or one with a similar cross sectional area) by employing permanent magnets with a higher maximum magnetic field at their pole tips, and keeping the magnetic field value high enough to saturate the particles, complete bead capture can be fulfilled at flow rates of 18 mL·min –1 and 104 mL·min –1 ; these values correspond to flow rates of approximately 1.6 (∇ B = 300 T·m –1 ) and 9.5 (∇ B = 1750 T·m –1 ) times higher than the ones than can be processed when using the 186 T·m –1 gradient employed in this study. However, increasing the magnetic field gradient by reducing the QMS radius (instead of increasing the maximum magnetic field) could entail an undesirable decrease of the flow rate that can be processed for providing entire bead capture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the micro-QMS exhibits an outstandingly improved efficiency, which substantiates its potential for being used for the recovery of magnetic beads when relatively high flow rates are required. These flow rates can be further increased by using higher magnetic field gradients, such as the ones considered in several QMSs published in the literature, namely, 300 T·m –1 or 1750 T·m –1 . , Assuming that these magnetic gradients can be ensured in the micro-QMS presented here (or one with a similar cross sectional area) by employing permanent magnets with a higher maximum magnetic field at their pole tips, and keeping the magnetic field value high enough to saturate the particles, complete bead capture can be fulfilled at flow rates of 18 mL·min –1 and 104 mL·min –1 ; these values correspond to flow rates of approximately 1.6 (∇ B = 300 T·m –1 ) and 9.5 (∇ B = 1750 T·m –1 ) times higher than the ones than can be processed when using the 186 T·m –1 gradient employed in this study. However, increasing the magnetic field gradient by reducing the QMS radius (instead of increasing the maximum magnetic field) could entail an undesirable decrease of the flow rate that can be processed for providing entire bead capture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generating regions with high magnetic field gradients has become a potential strategy for enhancing the efficiency of these systems. To this end, the use of several permanent magnets arranged in a quadrupolar orientation, which gives rise to a quadrupole magnetic sorter (QMS), represents an outstanding alternative since field gradients higher than those typically reached by a single permanent magnet could be obtained with QMSs. , Thereby, several QMSs have been designed and tested over the years for carrying out the magnetic isolation of both not labeled and labeled cells with magnetic beads. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetization of the bead is a function of the applied magnetic field. It is a linear function of the field (χH) up to a magnetic flux of approximately 0.1-0.5 T [31,82], after which it remains nearly constant, with a saturation magnetization of M sat that is independent of the applied magnetic field [31]. In the saturation region, Equation (6) needs to be replaced by the following equation [82]:…”
Section: Magnetic Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that a precise calculation of the interparticle effects as well as the effects that the particles have on the fluid field might be required for some applications. For example, magnetic dipole-dipole interactions or electrostatic interactions between particulate material could be beneficial for the separation process as they may speed up the aggregation of the material and/or magnify the force acting on it [82]. On the other hand, modifying the flow patterns as the material is separated might have detrimental consequences for the process if mixing is undesired and could underestimate the value of the force required for separation [33].…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foremost advantages of IONPs are (1) their superparamagnetic behavior that enables easy handling and manipulation using an external magnetic field [ 33 ], (2) their low-cost synthesis (mainly iron salts in an alkaline environment and the chemicals for surface modification) [ 34 ] and (3) a high surface-to-volume ratio [ 35 ]. To adjust the surface properties, IONPs are coated or functionalized to avoid aggregation or biodegradation, and to enhance their selectivity for adsorption of target molecules [ 36 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%