The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is arguably the best-known cognitive screen in the world. Originally designed to assess cognitive impairment in elderly populations, it has become one of the first steps toward a dementia diagnosis. Routinely used in the clinic and in research internationally, the MMSE, despite its flaws, has managed to retain its popularity for more than 30 years. This review explores when and how the test is used, lists its advantages and disadvantages, and ultimately questions its value. The specific issue that is addressed here is whether the test has outlived its original purpose. The conclusion is that although the MMSE may be a useful tool in many circumstances where a cognitive screen is required, practitioners should be wary of using MMSE total scores as a shortcut toward a dementia diagnosis. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) first appeared 34 years ago 1 and since then it has become arguably the most well known and used short cognitive screening instrument.
2-4Indeed, development of the MMSE-II is currently underway. A few reviews have appeared over the years assessing the test's merits but most have appeared in other languages than English. 5,6 The best-known English-language review appeared back in 1992, 7 while Mitchell 8 recently conducted a metaanalysis, the first attempt to quantify the test's validity over populations, testers, studies, and settings. The focus of the current review is 3-fold: (a) to examine whether the MMSE has fulfilled its original purpose, (b) to compare its advantages and disadvantages in a clear way, and (c) to stimulate the debate as to whether an MMSE total score should ever be used in the absence of more detailed assessment by clinicians attempting to make a dementia diagnosis.