2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-04732-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-adaptive weight vector adjustment strategy for decomposition-based multi-objective differential evolution algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, two mutation operators are used to enhance the search ability of the algorithm, and a chaotic strategy is introduced to update the parameters of DE. Fan et al [ 40 ] used alternative probability models in sampling to improve population diversity. And then combining the algorithm with DE and adopting an adaptive strategy to improve the convergence speed of the algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, two mutation operators are used to enhance the search ability of the algorithm, and a chaotic strategy is introduced to update the parameters of DE. Fan et al [ 40 ] used alternative probability models in sampling to improve population diversity. And then combining the algorithm with DE and adopting an adaptive strategy to improve the convergence speed of the algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second test is the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for multiple comparisons, which examines the differences among all algorithms across all functions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test is employed with a significance level of 0.05 [ 40 ]. By utilizing the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, we analyze the variable R + .…”
Section: Numerical Experiments and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since the values of L and d determine the dimensions of w and b, the MOM in ( 10) is an uncertainty optimization problem. Hence, most common multiobjective optimization algorithms, such as strength pareto evolutionary algorithm, nondominated sorting genetic algorithm-II, multiobjective evolutionary algorithm, and multiple objective particle swarm optimization [39], [40], [41], are also not suitable for…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization For Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering economic objectives and robustness objectives, this paper uses the MOMDE (Multi-Objective Molecular Differential Evolution) algorithm to solve the model. By using the evolutionary variation mechanism based on inter-molecular forces, it can overcome the precocious convergence phenomenon effectively and achieve efficient depth optimization [30,31]. The flow chart of the solution process is shown in…”
Section: Solution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%