Interspeech 2016 2016
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2016-291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Adaptive DNN for Improving Spoken Language Proficiency Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The baseline scoring model was built with approximately 130 automatic features extracted from the SpeechRater system, which can measure the pronunciation, prosody, fluency, rhythm, vocabulary, and grammar of spontaneous speech. All SpeechRater features were extracted either directly from the speech signal or from the output of a Kaldi-based automatic speech recognizer (Qian et al, 2016) with a word error rate of 20.9% on an independent evaluation set with non-native spontaneous speech from the TOEFL iBT speaking test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The baseline scoring model was built with approximately 130 automatic features extracted from the SpeechRater system, which can measure the pronunciation, prosody, fluency, rhythm, vocabulary, and grammar of spontaneous speech. All SpeechRater features were extracted either directly from the speech signal or from the output of a Kaldi-based automatic speech recognizer (Qian et al, 2016) with a word error rate of 20.9% on an independent evaluation set with non-native spontaneous speech from the TOEFL iBT speaking test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spread of English as the main global language for education and commerce is continuing, and there is a strong interest in developing assessment systems that can automatically score spontaneous speech from non-native speakers with the goals of reducing the burden on human raters, improving reliability, and generating feedback that can be used by language learners Higgins et al, 2011). Various features related to different aspects of speaking proficiency have been explored, such as features for pronunciation, prosody, and fluency (Cucchiarini et al, 2002;Chen et al, 2009;Cheng, 2011;Higgins et al, 2011), as well as features for vocabulary, grammar, and content Chen and Zechner, 2011;Chen and Zechner, 2011;Xie et al, 2012;Qian et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We trained a DNN-based ASR system using a fairly large corpus of non-native English adult speech, as described in Section 4.1, and made it self-adaptive to a test speaker in the children's corpus by i-vector-based speaker adaptation. This approach has been shown to be very effective for cross-task adaptation, from monologic speech to dialogic speech [27].…”
Section: A Speaker Adaption Of Dnn With I-vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with this mitigation, various papers have reported that improving ASR can lead to improvements in assessment with gains in machine-human correlation ranging from 0.02 to 0.7 e.g. [4,8,9]. Some features that may be beneficial for auto-marking are more affected by ASR errors, such as part-ofspeech tags and features related to the spoken content, so their use has been limited at present [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%