Selective Responses to Tonic Descending Commands by Temporal Summation in a Spinal Motor Pool

Abstract

Summary Motor responses of varying intensities rely on descending commands to heterogeneous pools of motoneurons. In vertebrates, numerous sources of descending excitatory input provide systematically more drive to progressively less excitable spinal motoneurons. While this presumably facilitates simultaneous activation of motor pools, it is unclear how selective patterns of recruitment could emerge from inputs weighted this way. Here, using in vivo electrophysiological and imaging approaches in larval zebrafish, we find that, despite weighted excitation, more excitable motoneurons are preferentially activated by a midbrain reticulospinal nucleus, by virtue of longer membrane time constants that facilitate temporal summation of tonic drive. We confirm the utility of this phenomenon by assessing the activity of the midbrain and motoneuron populations during a light-driven behavior. Our findings demonstrate that weighted descending commands can generate selective motor responses by exploiting systematic differences in the biophysical properties of target motoneurons and their relative sensitivity to tonic input.

Interfacing a salamander brain with a salamander-like robot: Control of speed and direction with calcium signals from brainstem reticulospinal neurons

“…A classical caveat with Ca 2+ -based measurements of neuronal activity is to determine whether the signal represents spiking or subthreshold activity. Electrophysiological recordings coupled with Ca 2+ imaging of the same neuron (with the same Ca 2+ indicator than the one used in the present study) revealed that a 0.09 increase in ΔF/F is associated with spiking [53], [54], and this is consistent with recent observations in salamanders (see [31]). This would indicate that most RS cells illustrated in e.g.…”

Control of Movement Initiation Underlies the Development of Balance

“…In contrast, asymmetric processing of pitch is straightforward to implement given central vestibular architecture. Pitch information is represented in the brain by distinct nose-up and nose-down channels — independent populations of vestibular neurons with direct projections to movement generation centers [27; 28; 29; 10; 30; 31; 32; 33]. Thus, functional asymmetries between the nose-up and nose-down channels could mediate asymmetric sensitivity.…”

Visual Threat Assessment and Reticulospinal Encoding of Calibrated Responses in Larval Zebrafish

“…The mechanisms responsible for recruiting Mauthner versus non-Mauthner escape circuits are still unclear, but presumably arise from a combination of their integrative properties and the nature of input from upstream visual processing centers [45]. One possibility is that visual inputs are evenly distributed among spinal projecting neurons.…”