2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective removal of toxic Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by adsorption combined with reduction at a magnetic nanocomposite surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, adsorption remains an effective method for Cr(VI) remediation [6], which involves the conversion from toxic Cr(VI) to mild Cr(III) in the adsorption process [7,8]. Various adsorbents have been developed, such as biochar [9,10], the metal-organic framework [11,12], nanoscale zero-valent iron [13,14], graphene oxide [15,16], and organic polymer [17,18]. Unfortunately, current adsorbents generally suffer from unsatisfactory removal capacity, a low adsorption rate, and weak reduction capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, adsorption remains an effective method for Cr(VI) remediation [6], which involves the conversion from toxic Cr(VI) to mild Cr(III) in the adsorption process [7,8]. Various adsorbents have been developed, such as biochar [9,10], the metal-organic framework [11,12], nanoscale zero-valent iron [13,14], graphene oxide [15,16], and organic polymer [17,18]. Unfortunately, current adsorbents generally suffer from unsatisfactory removal capacity, a low adsorption rate, and weak reduction capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitting results showed that the adsorption process was better expressed by the Langmuir model (R 2 = 0.999). Moreover, R L was between 0 and 1, indicating that the adsorption of Cr(VI) by PPy/HMSNs was a favorable process [32][33][34]. For the 1/n of Freundlich, values less than 0.5 demonstrated that the adsorbent could easily adsorb Cr(VI).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, at higher pH, the repulsion between anionic chromium spices with negative surface charges on the PANI/Ag (AMPSA)/GO QDs nanocomposite plays a major role in decreasing the adsorption efficiency. 10,25,[29][30][31][32] Although, the R of Cr(VI) from solution at pH 12 using PANI/Ag (AMPSA)/GO QDs NC is only 61%, this value is much higher than other adsorbents. [28][29][30]33 3.1.2 Mechanism of Cr(VI) removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%