2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-020-01355-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Photo-epoxidation of (R)-(+)- and (S)-(−)-Limonene by Chiral and Non-Chiral Dioxo-Mo(VI) Complexes Anchored on TiO2-Nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selectivity values observed, on the contrary, do show that the MoO 2 unit is more selective being directly functionalized onto the solid metal-organic structure. This phenomenon has been previously observed in epoxidation reactions of natural products such as Limonene and alphapinene, using different supports, and has been associated with the stability generated at the active center, when it is incorporated covalently on a solid structure, originating a more selective process towards the epoxide [102][103][104]. Additionally, when MoO 2 Cl 2 @COMOC-4 was compared with heterogeneous catalysts based on oxo-tungsten active centers (Entry 4-5, Table 3), SiO 2 , Amberlite IR-120, or AlO 3 solid supports that use inorganic acids as co-catalysts (Entry 7-9, Table 3), the same trend was observed in the conversion and selectivity values.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 54%
“…The selectivity values observed, on the contrary, do show that the MoO 2 unit is more selective being directly functionalized onto the solid metal-organic structure. This phenomenon has been previously observed in epoxidation reactions of natural products such as Limonene and alphapinene, using different supports, and has been associated with the stability generated at the active center, when it is incorporated covalently on a solid structure, originating a more selective process towards the epoxide [102][103][104]. Additionally, when MoO 2 Cl 2 @COMOC-4 was compared with heterogeneous catalysts based on oxo-tungsten active centers (Entry 4-5, Table 3), SiO 2 , Amberlite IR-120, or AlO 3 solid supports that use inorganic acids as co-catalysts (Entry 7-9, Table 3), the same trend was observed in the conversion and selectivity values.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 54%
“…The grafting of the organic molecule on the solid matrix is accompanied by a trimethylsilanol formation, which can easily be eliminated as volatile hexamethyldisiloxane and water [33–35] . This silyl ether substitution on the surface has been previously described as an effective synthetic route to obtain carboxylate‐covalent grafted materials without desorption of the linker moiety [35–37] and a synergistic chemical bond for hybrid catalysts participating in photoinduced electron transfer processes [38,39] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the photocatalytic activity of a dioxo-molybdenum complex supported on nanostructured TiO 2 was assessed in the selective epoxidation of terpenic structures such as limonene and α-and β-pinene, using molecular O 2 as the primary oxidizing agent. These results showed that immobilization of the dioxomolybdenum complex not only resulted in an increased stability of the MoO 2 active units but also resulted in an enhanced transfer rate of oxygen atoms besides its specific capacity to be reoxidized by the interaction with O 2 [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%