2015
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective isolation of bacteria for metagenomic analysis: Impact of membrane characteristics on bacterial filterability

Abstract: For indirect DNA extraction for metagenomics studies, bacterial cells can be effectively separated from sample debris by using a simple size exclusion technique, such as filtration, and thereafter lysed. The requirement for the optimal recovery of cells in filtrates is critical to achieve sufficient DNA yield and a representative population. Particles smaller than the filter pore size are expected to be found in the filtrate, whereas particles larger than the filter pore sizes are excluded. However, this is no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(275 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirming previous reports in the literature, the depth filter (glass microfiber membrane) is efficient in removing potential foulants, but retains significant numbers of microorganisms for reasons described by Nnadozie et al A 3‐h enrichment step was, therefore, added to precede the 10 min enzyme treatment and subsequent prefiltration. This approach increased the number of cells by a factor of 2 (from 35% to 70%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confirming previous reports in the literature, the depth filter (glass microfiber membrane) is efficient in removing potential foulants, but retains significant numbers of microorganisms for reasons described by Nnadozie et al A 3‐h enrichment step was, therefore, added to precede the 10 min enzyme treatment and subsequent prefiltration. This approach increased the number of cells by a factor of 2 (from 35% to 70%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Protocols based on commercially available modules represent a critical step in enabling other laboratories to use an approach that combines enzyme treatment, cross‐flow HF microfiltration, and short enrichment times to recover high concentrations of viable bacteria. As reviewed by Nnadozie et al, complex interactions between sample and membrane surfaces require that the protocols for recovery of microorganisms from environmental samples be developed on a case‐by‐case basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple reports showed that foods could be filtered through membranes in quantities useful for conventional detection procedures (such as plating), although cross‐flow microfiltration or ultrafiltration of cells and proteins resulted in fouling of the membrane and limited the volume of sample that could be processed . We showed that endopeptidase treatment followed by hollow fiber microfiltration was effective in overcoming fouling of the hollow fiber membrane, while avoiding loss of viability of the Salmonella cells .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Living unicellular particles such as bacteria, yeasts, algae or red blood cells exhibit, in environmental conditions, a large variability of individual particle size, shape and envelope flexibility. Effectively, in the specific case of bacteria filtration, the cell size of the microorganisms is not the only parameter which determines the transfer through the membrane [10]. Recent works demonstrated that the shape of the bacteria cell [3] and the Gram type [7,8], which characterize the cell wall composition, are also important parameters that play a key role in the particle retention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%