2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacteria transfer by deformation through microfiltration membrane

Abstract: Living particles such as bacteria are able to transfer through membrane pores that are smaller than cell size due to the specific stiffness of this type of microorganism. This phenomenon can lead to a significant loss of selectivity in the filtration process, which is a major cause of concern in the sterilizing filtration step. This study investigates the retention of three bacteria strains: Escherichia coli CIP 54124, Pseudomonas aeruginosa CIP 103467 and Staphylococcus aureus CIP 53154 by model porous membra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that bacteria could not be readily washed out across the membrane pores and their deposition on membrane surface and pores caused pore clogging and/or membrane fouling, as evidenced by the increased TMP. While it has been reported that the flexibility of the peptidoglycan cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., E. cloacae) may allow deformation and penetration across the membrane to some extent [28,29], the results of our tests proved otherwise. In contrast, with the membrane of 2.4 µm pore size, a noticeable decreasing and increasing trend in the concentration of bacteria in the reactor medium and permeate was observed, respectively.…”
Section: The Effect Of Membrane Pore Size On Bacteria Removalcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…This indicates that bacteria could not be readily washed out across the membrane pores and their deposition on membrane surface and pores caused pore clogging and/or membrane fouling, as evidenced by the increased TMP. While it has been reported that the flexibility of the peptidoglycan cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., E. cloacae) may allow deformation and penetration across the membrane to some extent [28,29], the results of our tests proved otherwise. In contrast, with the membrane of 2.4 µm pore size, a noticeable decreasing and increasing trend in the concentration of bacteria in the reactor medium and permeate was observed, respectively.…”
Section: The Effect Of Membrane Pore Size On Bacteria Removalcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…[80][81][82] The bacterial cell wall can be elastic and deform under pressure or become less rigid dependent on the environment, such as the presence of antibiotics. [83][84][85] The presence of foulant is known to improve the removal of extracellular DNA containing ARGs and ARB, 49 which most likely led to the variability of the microbial community and differential removal of ARGs found in the final filtrate. Optimization of the control of the level of foulant could improve ARB and ARG removal.…”
Section: Enumeration Of 16s Rrna Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In porous media, the flow and shear rate distribution will yield a complex combination of the behaviours discussed above. Bacteria are capable of moving through pores sizes smaller than their body size [295]. Magnetotactic bacteria are able to travel effectively through heterogeneous porous media and overcome relatively high pore water velocities (~250µm/s) via magnetotaxis [296].…”
Section: Microbiological Transport In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%