The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2005.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective assimilation by deposit feeders: Experimental evidence using stable isotope ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is possible that these organisms use some completely separate, low δ 13 C resource not associated with the benthos (as suggested above for odonates preying on zooplankton), this explanation seems unlikely for consumers such as chironomids that are tied more tightly to the benthos by their foraging styles and limited mobility. Instead, the low δ 13 C of these organisms probably indicates selective assimilation of some 13 C‐depleted component of the sediment OM (Doi et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is possible that these organisms use some completely separate, low δ 13 C resource not associated with the benthos (as suggested above for odonates preying on zooplankton), this explanation seems unlikely for consumers such as chironomids that are tied more tightly to the benthos by their foraging styles and limited mobility. Instead, the low δ 13 C of these organisms probably indicates selective assimilation of some 13 C‐depleted component of the sediment OM (Doi et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Vander Zanden et al (2006) found that benthic microalgal and benthic invertebrate production decrease with water depth. Doi et al (2006) suggested that the food sources for benthic invertebrates shift from benthic algae to deposited phytoplankton with increasing water depth. Thus, the light condition of the habitat is an important factor determining the contribution of benthic algal production to consumers in the habitat.…”
Section: Light Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In shallow benthic habitats, benthic microalgae are the dominant resource, and allochthonous inputs include terrestrial matter and sinking phytoplankton from the epilimnion (Covich et al 1999;Yoshii 1999;Doi et al 2006). The contribution of settling phytoplankton to benthic invertebrates increases with increasing water depth (e.g., Doi et al 2006), and allochthonous sources, mainly pelagic production, become the dominant resource in benthic food webs below the light compensation depth. (Allan and Castillo 2007).…”
Section: Lake Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At lower latitudes, delta values of carbon stable isotopes in larval chironomids are often more negative in offshore, deeper waters relative to the shoreline (Vander Zanden and Rasmussen 1999;Hershey et al 2006;Syväranta et al 2006;Jones et al 2008). These patterns have been related to a different diet in profundal zones, shifting from littoral benthic algae to the consumption of methanogenic bacteria (Jones et al 2008) or phytoplankton biomass that has settled from the water column (Doi et al 2006;Premke et al 2010). For polar desert lakes, we hypothesized that the MMHg concentrations of chironomid larvae may be influenced by water depth preference due to variation in diet (i.e., littoral benthic algae vs. phytoplankton and methanogenic bacteria) or to differences in MMHg exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%