2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective antibacterial activity of the cationic peptide PaDBS1R6 against Gram-negative bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A single dose (64 µM) of PaDBS1R6 was capable of reducing the initial bacterial load (∼10 8 CFU.mL −1 ) by up to three orders of magnitude after 2 days of treatment (Table 2). However, after four days of infection, the bacterial load increased for both peptide-treated and control animals, which might be related to degradation events in vivo (Fensterseifer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Automated Amino Acid Patterns Inserted Into Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A single dose (64 µM) of PaDBS1R6 was capable of reducing the initial bacterial load (∼10 8 CFU.mL −1 ) by up to three orders of magnitude after 2 days of treatment (Table 2). However, after four days of infection, the bacterial load increased for both peptide-treated and control animals, which might be related to degradation events in vivo (Fensterseifer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Automated Amino Acid Patterns Inserted Into Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…PaDBS1R6F10 decreased the bacterial load gradually, reaching a reduction of ∼10 3 CFU.mL −1 after 4 days of treatment. Interestingly, this derivate exhibit improved in vivo activity when compared to the parental peptide PaDBS1R6, which did not maintain its anti-infective efficacy in vivo on the fourth day (Fensterseifer et al, 2019). According to the authors, this might suggest that the in vivo activity of these peptides (PaDBS1R6 and PaDBS1R6F10) is time-dependent and possibly involves peptide degradation events.…”
Section: Automated Amino Acid Patterns Inserted Into Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for PaDBS1R1 (11) and EcDBS1R5 (12). EcDBS1R6 (18) is also capable of killing Gram-positive bacteria, in addition to Gram-negatives (Table 1). Together with the absence of toxicity at antimicrobial concentrations, this peptide had a selective index of 12.92 against Gram-negative bacteria, which allows it to be considered as a safe drug, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (19), especially due to its absence of toxicity to kidney cells (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, P. aeruginosa PAO1 bacterial strain is reported to be susceptible due to the presence of 2-amino-2,6-dideoxy-D-galactopyranose on LPS and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 strain is resistant to the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) by the absence of LPS B-band [58]. Also, the presence of cardiolipin appears to be a determinant for AMP antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacteria [59]. Likewise, DMS-DA6 peptides act by strong perturbation of the bacterial membrane against the Grampositive bacteria S. aureus ATCC 6538 but not against the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli ATCC 35218 because of specificity DMS-DA6 interaction with peptidoglycan, a major component of the membrane of Gram-positive bacteria [60].…”
Section: Small Intestine Submucosamentioning
confidence: 99%