2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2017.7981111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective and decentralized underfrequency protection schemes in the distribution grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed analysis of this frequency control is shown in [10]. Two main protection function for low and medium voltage distribution grid are overload control and voltage stability.…”
Section: Fig 8 Concept Of Grid Supporting Charging Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed analysis of this frequency control is shown in [10]. Two main protection function for low and medium voltage distribution grid are overload control and voltage stability.…”
Section: Fig 8 Concept Of Grid Supporting Charging Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• advanced load monitoring concepts including centralized [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] or decentralized monitoring [17][18][19][20][21][22]; • application of various types of hybrid systems [13,23,24] including those using advanced optimization algorithms (e.g., meta-heuristic techniques [14,15]); • application of wide area monitoring systems [25][26][27][28] or smart grid technology [13,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]; • use of information technology [4,33,34] including Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems [35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the number and total capacity of generators that are tied to the distribution network is increasing steadily in France and many other countries, under the effect of massive distributed renewable energy sources (DRES) deployment. This trend is challenging the traditional ufls scheme [1315]; indeed, the consumption profile of many feeders now results both from local consumption and from local generation – not from local loads alone any more. This potentially increases the risk that the weight of a particular UFLS step will vary wildly over time and drift away from its target weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%