2007
DOI: 10.1080/14786430701373672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of α variants during microstructural evolution inα/βtitanium alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d. All the variants appear as either long or short laths, which are similar to those observed in experiments [12,20,49,50].…”
Section: An Infinite Straight Edge Dislocationsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1d. All the variants appear as either long or short laths, which are similar to those observed in experiments [12,20,49,50].…”
Section: An Infinite Straight Edge Dislocationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…4e and h). These clusters have also been observed frequently in experiments [20,22,52]. Interestingly, the tent structure obtained is similar in terms of morphology to that observed during a diffusionless phase transformation when martensite bulged out on the sample surface [53].…”
Section: Effects Of Interaction Among Different a Variants On Variantsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grain boundary can have significant effect on mechanical behaviour, especially toughness and ductility [1]. Consequently its formation has been extensively investigated [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. These studies confirm that gb is usually related to one of the adjacent grains by the Burgers orientation relationship (BOR):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, limited defects are present at the interface, which is inferred to be a result of the atom rearrangement at the interface, reducing the interfacial energy, which is similar to the self-accommodation between α 2 variants [38]. The reported self-accommodation effects were observed in titanium alloys and the angle between (0001)α 2 planes was 60 • , which was caused by the Burgers orientation relationship during the disordered β to α transformation [38]. For TiAl alloys, the 71 • deviation is easy to understand in the massive transformation; however, detailed observation of the interface is scarce.…”
Section: Precipitation Behavior Of α2 Phase During Annealing At 1250 °Cmentioning
confidence: 99%