2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-010-0412-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of the best fit flood frequency distribution and parameter estimation procedure: a case study for Tasmania in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MADI and PPCC have been used in different studies (for example see [23], [9,[25][26][27], and many others). Similarly, the AD test is frequently used in many studies such as [12] and [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Goodness Of Fit Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MADI and PPCC have been used in different studies (for example see [23], [9,[25][26][27], and many others). Similarly, the AD test is frequently used in many studies such as [12] and [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Goodness Of Fit Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been used for the goodness-of-fi t measure such as including the Chi-square method, quantile-quantile plots, mean absolute deviation index, LMRD, RMSE, KST, and ADT. These tests have been used by many authors [8,16,36,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. In this study we implemented three GOF tests -RMSE, KS, and AD -and one graphical method, i.e., LRD for visual inspection.…”
Section: Goodness-of-fi T Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point it is worth emphasizing that the accuracy with which the quantiles are estimated is a fundamental criterion for selecting a distribution (MADSEN et al, 1997). By considering that the MAE and MSE are scalar measures of agreement (WILKS, 2011) that evaluates the reliability of quantile estimates made by a given model (HADDAD & RAHMAN, 2011), we may assume that the GPD fits better than the GEV to the extreme dry SPI values obtained from the weather station of Ribeirão Preto. Considering the 95% confidence interval, the visual analysis of Figure 2 clearly indicates that the GEV model is inconsistent with the most extremes SPI values obtained from the weather station of Ribeirão Preto.…”
Section: Block Maxima and Peaks-over-thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%