2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2013.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of stable reference genes in heat stressed peripheral blood mononuclear cells of tropically adapted Indian cattle and buffaloes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent past, our groups has conducted number of similar Reference genes for qPCR studies across tissues of riverine buffaloes Reference genes for qPCR studies across tissues of riverine buffaloes studies to identify appropriate reference gene panels for application in transcriptional studies in Indian native cattle and riverine buffaloes. In one such study, β2M, RPS9 and RPS15a genes were identified as best RGs for heat stressed mononuclear cells of Indian cattle and buffaloes [19]; β2M, RPS23, RPL4 and EEF1A1 as most reliable RGs in heat stressed mammary explants and mammary epithelial cells of buffaloes [6,7]; RPL4, EEF1A1, ACTB and GAPDH genes were found to be most stable genes in milk derived mammary epithelial cells in Sahiwal cows during different lactation stages [30]. Similarly identification of stable reference genes for transcriptional studies in bulls distinctive in meat quality [5] and in buffalo muscle tissue [31] were also reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent past, our groups has conducted number of similar Reference genes for qPCR studies across tissues of riverine buffaloes Reference genes for qPCR studies across tissues of riverine buffaloes studies to identify appropriate reference gene panels for application in transcriptional studies in Indian native cattle and riverine buffaloes. In one such study, β2M, RPS9 and RPS15a genes were identified as best RGs for heat stressed mononuclear cells of Indian cattle and buffaloes [19]; β2M, RPS23, RPL4 and EEF1A1 as most reliable RGs in heat stressed mammary explants and mammary epithelial cells of buffaloes [6,7]; RPL4, EEF1A1, ACTB and GAPDH genes were found to be most stable genes in milk derived mammary epithelial cells in Sahiwal cows during different lactation stages [30]. Similarly identification of stable reference genes for transcriptional studies in bulls distinctive in meat quality [5] and in buffalo muscle tissue [31] were also reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA samples were stored at -80˚C till further use. First strand cDNA was synthesized using 100ng RNA as described in our previous studies [7,19] using the program: 25˚C for 5 min, 50˚C for 60 min, and 70˚C for 15 min. cDNA was then diluted 1:4 (v:v) with DNase/RNase free water.…”
Section: Total Rna Extraction and Cdna Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kishore et al (2013) evaluated the expression stability of 11 commonly reported ICGs in heat stressed PBMCs of cattle and buffaloes based on stability measures. The analysis identified Beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) and ribosomal proteins (RPS9 and RPS15) as most stably expressed genes and were thus used for normalization of expression data of major HSP genes.…”
Section: Normalization and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the SG and RB breeds appeared to have more genetic variants at HSP 90 than WF and AM breeds showing a greater polymorphisms in the former's than the latter. The detected genetic variants of HSP 90 gene could be interrogated as veritable genetic resource for improvement programme of thermo-tolerance, adaptability and survivability advantage to cope with wide range of thermal stress and environmental variations especially in the hot humid tropics (Schwerin et al, 2002a;Kishore et al, 2013) as well as disease tolerance and drug resistance of animals under thermal stress (Zhang et al, 2002b;Aufricht, 2005;Singh et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%