2020
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Immunobiotic Ligilactobacillus salivarius Strains from the Intestinal Tract of Wakame-Fed Pigs: Functional and Genomic Studies

Abstract: In this article, Ligilactobacillus salivarius FFIG strains, isolated from the intestinal tract of wakame-fed pigs, are characterized according to their potential probiotic properties. Strains were evaluated by studying their interaction with porcine intestinal epithelial (PIE) cells in terms of their ability to regulate toll-like receptor (TLR)-3- or TLR4-mediated innate immune responses, as well as by assessing their adhesion capabilities to porcine epithelial cells and mucins. These functional studies were c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the ability of L. salivarius TUCO-L2 to adhere to porcine intestinal epithelial (PIE) cells was assessed. Comparison of the TUCO-L2 strain with the FFIG58 and FFIG79 strains, which have been demonstrated to have high and low adhesion to PIE cells, respectively (Zhou et al, 2020 ) indicated that L. salivarius TUCO-L2 adheres to PIE cells, and the adhesion was significantly different from that of the two control strains ( Figure 4B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the ability of L. salivarius TUCO-L2 to adhere to porcine intestinal epithelial (PIE) cells was assessed. Comparison of the TUCO-L2 strain with the FFIG58 and FFIG79 strains, which have been demonstrated to have high and low adhesion to PIE cells, respectively (Zhou et al, 2020 ) indicated that L. salivarius TUCO-L2 adheres to PIE cells, and the adhesion was significantly different from that of the two control strains ( Figure 4B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Porcine mucin from the small intestine was purified as described in Materials and Methods and used to evaluate the adhesion of the TUCO-L2 strain ( Figure 4A ). L. salivarius FFIG58 and FFIG79 isolated from the intestinal tract of wakame-fed pigs were used for comparison; these strains have been demonstrated to have low and high binding to porcine mucins, respectively (Zhou et al, 2020 ). L. salivarius TUCO-L2 demonstrated strong binding to porcine mucins that was not different from the binding of the FFIG79 strain ( Figure 4A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adhesion of L. delbrueckii subsp. lactis CRL 581 to PIE cells was performed using fluorescent bacteria and the microplate method, as described previously [25]. In these experiments, L. salivarius FFIG58 and L. salivarius FFIG79 strains [25] were used for comparisons.…”
Section: Adhesion To Pie Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porcine mucin from the small intestine was purified as described in Materials and Methods and used to evaluate the adhesion of the TUCO-L2 strain ( Figure 4A). L. salivarius FFIG58 and FFIG79 isolated from the intestinal tract of wakame-fed pigs were used for comparison; these strains have been demonstrated to have low and high binding to porcine mucins, respectively (Zhou et al, 2020). L. salivarius TUCO-L2 demonstrated strong binding to porcine mucins that was not different from the binding of the FFIG79 strain ( Figure 4A).…”
Section: In Vitro Adhesive and Immunomodulatory Properties Of L Salimentioning
confidence: 99%