Selection of appropriate statistical methods for data analysis

Abstract

In biostatistics, for each of the specific situation, statistical methods are available for analysis and interpretation of the data. To select the appropriate statistical method, one need to know the assumption and conditions of the statistical methods, so that proper statistical method can be selected for data analysis. Two main statistical methods are used in data analysis: descriptive statistics, which summarizes data using indexes such as mean and median and another is inferential statistics, which draw conclusions from data using statistical tests such as student's t -test. Selection of appropriate statistical method depends on the following three things: Aim and objective of the study, Type and distribution of the data used, and Nature of the observations (paired/unpaired). All type of statistical methods that are used to compare the means are called parametric while statistical methods used to compare other than means (ex-median/mean ranks/proportions) are called nonparametric methods. In the present article, we have discussed the parametric and non-parametric methods, their assumptions, and how to select appropriate statistical methods for analysis and interpretation of the biomedical data.

Ergothioneine Mitigates Telomere Shortening under Oxidative Stress Conditions

“…Results obtained from each treatment and at each time point were compared with the appropriate control group using Student's t test (independent samples t test) (Mishra et al 2019).…”

Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries

“…Using a statistical test when its assumptions were not met directly gives erroneous results, and all their consequent interpretations would be unsubstantiated and most probably wrong. It is a pity that high-quality data, often collected by expensive and elaborious methods, are then processed inappropriately leading to incorrect conclusions ( 138 ). Again, in order to prevent waste of precious resources and get the best out of our research, it is necessary to invest much more in training clinical researchers with statistical skills in close future ( 139 - 140 ).…”

Tissue expression of lactate transporters (MCT1 and MCT4) and prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (brief report)

“…Among positive patients, the average was calculated and employed as a cut-off value to define “low expressing” or “high expressing” patients. The use of the average intensity allowed a more conservative definition of the “high expressing patients” as compared to the median being more sensitive to high values in skewed distributions [ 15 , 16 ].…”